Publication:
Investigation of the demodex lid infestation with in vivo confocal microscopy versus light microscopy in patients with seborrheic blepharitis

dc.contributor.coauthorArıcı, Ceyhun
dc.contributor.coauthorMergen, Burak
dc.contributor.coauthorBahar Tokman, Hrisi
dc.contributor.coauthorTokuç, Edip
dc.contributor.coauthorÖztürk Bakar, Yeşim
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.facultymemberYes
dc.contributor.kuauthorŞahin, Afsun
dc.contributor.kuauthorTaş, Ayşe Yıldız
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSCHOOL OF MEDICINE
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T23:44:19Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractAim: The comparison of the diagnostic efficiency of a reference method (light microscopy [LM] using 10% potassium hydroxide [KOH]) with the use of 100% alcohol to in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) for the detection of Demodex eyelid infestation in seborrheic blepharitis patients. Methods: Eyelashes were epilated from the right eyes for the reference method and the left eyes for the alcohol group in 58 eyes of 29 patients. IVCM was used on the left eyes. The primary outcomes were the number of Demodex mites per lash and the rate of Demodex positivity (>= 1 mite). Results: The rate of Demodex positivity was similar among the three groups (KOH: 82.8%, alcohol: 86.2%, IVCM: 72.4%; p >.05). The mean number of mites per lash in the KOH group (1.5 +/- 1.3) was higher than in the alcohol (0.9 +/- 0.6, p =.041) and IVCM groups (0.9 +/- 0.9, p =.036). Conclusion: KOH was found to be superior in terms of the quantification of mites compared to alcohol and IVCM.
dc.description.fulltextNo
dc.description.harvestedfromManual
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.openaccessNO
dc.description.peerreviewstatusN/A
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.readpublishN/A
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.studentonlypublicationNo
dc.description.studentpublicationNo
dc.description.versionN/A
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09273948.2020.1857792
dc.identifier.eissn1744-5078
dc.identifier.embargoN/A
dc.identifier.endpage977
dc.identifier.issn0927-3948
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.pubmed33560183
dc.identifier.quartileQ2
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85100775476
dc.identifier.startpage973
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/09273948.2020.1857792
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/13646
dc.identifier.volume30
dc.identifier.wos000616572900001
dc.keywordsSeborrheic blepharitis
dc.keywordsDemodex
dc.keywordsKOH
dc.keywordsAlcohol
dc.keywordsConfocal microscopy
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Inc
dc.relation.affiliationKoç University
dc.relation.collectionKoç University Institutional Repository
dc.relation.ispartofOcular Immunology And Inflammation
dc.relation.openaccessN/A
dc.rightsN/A
dc.subjectOphthalmology
dc.subjectDemodex infestation
dc.subjectKOH examination
dc.subjectEyelid margin disease
dc.titleInvestigation of the demodex lid infestation with in vivo confocal microscopy versus light microscopy in patients with seborrheic blepharitis
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorTaş, Ayşe Yıldız
local.contributor.kuauthorŞahin, Afsun
relation.isGoalOfPublicationa9786601-9431-4553-9a46-013bb366fb87
relation.isGoalOfPublication.latestForDiscoverya9786601-9431-4553-9a46-013bb366fb87
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e

Files