Publication:
Understanding the research needs and educational methods of surgeons to help guide future Spine Deformity research: a survey of AO Spine members

Placeholder

Departments

School / College / Institute

Organizational Unit

Program

KU Authors

Co-Authors

Morawska, M. M.
Lewis, N.
Smith, J. S.
Polly, D. W.
Basu, S.
Klineberg, E.
Kato, S.
Berven, S.
Pellise, F.
Qiu, Y.

Editor & Affiliation

Compiler & Affiliation

Translator

Other Contributor

Date

Language

eng

Embargo Status

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Alternative Title

Abstract

Study Design Cross-sectional survey. Objective Outcomes research has significantly shaped patient management in spine deformity care, while the dissemination of research remains a challenge. To guide future research directions, this study surveyed AO Spine members to identify the research needs, dissemination methods, and existing knowledge gaps. Methods An anonymous, English-language survey containing 40 questions explored knowledge gaps, research priorities, and knowledge translation practices. Distributed via email to AO Spine members globally, the questionnaire collected responses from March 20 to April 14, 2025. Results 399 responses were received from mostly orthopedic surgeons, 28% from Asia Pacific, 27% from Europe and South Africa, 18% from Latin America, 16% from North America, and 11% from the Middle East and North Africa. Of the 279 respondents focused on deformity surgery, most utilized classification tools, clinical guidelines, and multicenter study findings for decision-making. However, over half were unaware of past Knowledge Forum Deformity resources, indicating a dissemination gap. Key sources of information were publications, conferences, and AO Spine courses. Major barriers to implementing new tools included workflow integration and administrative challenges. Top research priorities were the development of diagnostic and treatment guidelines (71%) and prediction algorithms (69%). Prominent knowledge gaps included proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) (69%), spinal alignment guidelines (54%), and osteoporosis management (52%). Conclusion The survey highlights PJK, spinal alignment, and osteoporosis as the leading knowledge gaps. Priorities for future research include developing guidelines and prediction tools. Improved dissemination strategies are needed to enhance clinical adoption and inform ongoing research and education initiatives.

Source

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health sciences, Medicine, Surgery, Pathology and forensic medicine

Citation

Has Part

Source

Global Spine Journal

Book Series Title

Edition

DOI

10.1177/21925682261482073

item.page.datauri

Link

Rights

Copyrights Note

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Goal

0

Views

0

Downloads

View PlumX Details