Publication:
Comparison of intraoperative and postoperative analgesic properties of ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric and sacral epidural block in pediatric unilateral inguinal hernia operations

dc.contributor.coauthorMahli, A.
dc.contributor.departmentKUH (Koç University Hospital)
dc.contributor.kuauthorCoşarcan, Sami Kaan
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteKUH (KOÇ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL)
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T12:18:10Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Central blocks such as caudal, spinal, and sacral epidural are frequently used in pediatric inguinal surgeries. Furthermore, peripheral blocks have been used and successful results have been obtained in pediatric inguinal surgeries. In this study, we aimed to compare the intraoperative and postoperative analgesic efficacy of the ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric (IL/IH) block under general anesthesia with the sacral epidural block. Methods: This study was carried out in Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, after obtaining permission from the Ethics Committee of Gazi University Faculty of Medicine and the Central Ethics Committee of the General Directorate of Pharmaceuticals and Pharmacy of the Turkish Ministry of Health, numbered B.10.0.İEG.011.00.01. Sixty patients in the American Society of Anesthesiologists I-II group between the ages of 1 and 8 years who will undergo elective unilateral inguinal hernia operation under general anesthesia were randomly divided into two groups. Group S (n=30) sacral epidural block and group I (n=30) IL/IH nerve block were planned. Results: Hemodynamic values were found to be statistically significantly lower than control values in both groups. The minimum alveolar concentration values for sevoflurane were statistically significantly lower values in both groups at all surgery periods. In terms of additional analgesic requirement, the group I was found to be statistically significantly lower than the group s at the 8th-12th h. When the first analgesic intake hours were examined, no significant difference was found between the two groups. Conclusion: In our study, group I and group S analgesic efficacy was found to be similar. / Amaç: pediatrik inguinal girişimlerde kaudal, spinal ve sakral epidural gibi santral bloklar sıklıkla kullanılmaktadır. Bu girişimlerde periferik bloklar da kullanılmakta ve başarılı sonuçlar alınmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, genel anestezi altında ilioinguinal/ iliohipogastrik bloğunun intraoperatif ve postoperatif analjezik etkinliğini sakral epidural blok ile karşılaştırmayı amaçladık. Gereç ve yöntem: bu çalışma, Gazi Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Anabilim Dalı’nda, Gazi Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Etik Kurulu’ndan ve Sağlık Bakanlığı İlaç ve Eczacılık Genel Müdürlüğü Merkez Etik Kurulu’ndan B.10.0.İEG.011.00.01 numaralı izin alındıktan sonra gerçekleştirilmiştir. ASA I - II grubunda olup genel anestezi altında elektif tek taraflı inguinal herni ameliyatı olacak, yaşları 1-8 arasında olan 60 hasta randomize olarak iki gruba ayrıldı: Grup S (n=30) sakral epidural blok grubu ve Grup I (n=30) ilioinguinal / iliohipogastrik sinir bloğu grubu. Bulgular: hemodinamik değerler her iki grupta da kontrol değerlerinden istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede düşük bulundu. Sevofluran için MAC değerleri, tüm cerrahi periyotlarda her iki grupta da istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede düşüktü. Ek analjezik gereksiniminin Grup I’da, 8. ve 12. saatlerde Grup S’ye göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede düşük olduğu gözlendi. İlk analjezik alım saatleri açısından iki grup arasında anlamlı fark bulunmadı. Sonuç: çalışmamızda Grup I ve Grup S’de analjezik etkinlikleri benzer bulundu.
dc.description.fulltextYES
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.indexedbyTR Dizin
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.openaccessYES
dc.description.publisherscopeNational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.sponsorshipN/A
dc.description.versionPublisher version
dc.description.volume34
dc.identifier.doi10.14744/agri.2021.48254
dc.identifier.embargoNO
dc.identifier.filenameinventorynoIR03433
dc.identifier.issn1300-0012
dc.identifier.quartileN/A
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85123229686
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/1449
dc.keywordsAnalgesics
dc.keywordsChild, preschool
dc.keywordsHernia, inguinal
dc.keywordsHerniorrhaphy
dc.keywordsHumans
dc.keywordsInfant
dc.keywordsNerve block
dc.keywordsPain, postoperative
dc.language.isotur
dc.publisherKare Yayıncılık
dc.relation.grantnoNA
dc.relation.ispartofPain / Ağrı
dc.relation.urihttp://cdm21054.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/IR/id/10228
dc.subjectCaudal anesthesia
dc.subjectPediatrics
dc.subjectNerve block
dc.titleComparison of intraoperative and postoperative analgesic properties of ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric and sacral epidural block in pediatric unilateral inguinal hernia operations
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorCoşarcan, Sami Kaan
local.publication.orgunit1KUH (KOÇ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL)
local.publication.orgunit2KUH (Koç University Hospital)
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationf91d21f0-6b13-46ce-939a-db68e4c8d2ab
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryf91d21f0-6b13-46ce-939a-db68e4c8d2ab
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication055775c9-9efe-43ec-814f-f6d771fa6dee
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery055775c9-9efe-43ec-814f-f6d771fa6dee

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
10228.pdf
Size:
141.3 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format