Publication:
Development, validity and reliability of the 4-point likert Turkish version of cognitive failures questionnaire

dc.contributor.coauthorAydemir, Ömer
dc.contributor.departmentKUH (Koç University Hospital)
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.kuauthorDinçer, Neris
dc.contributor.kuauthorErcan, Alaattin Cenk
dc.contributor.kuauthorEser, Hale Yapıcı
dc.contributor.kuauthorKılçıksız, Can Mişel
dc.contributor.kuauthorKılıç, Özge
dc.contributor.kuauthorKüçüker, Mehmet Utku
dc.contributor.kuauthorYalçınay-İnan, Merve
dc.contributor.kuauthorYılmaz, Sezen Güçlü
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteKUH (KOÇ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL)
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSCHOOL OF MEDICINE
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T23:52:58Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractAim: Cognitive failures are suggested to be a transdiagnostic endophenotype that increases the vulnerability for psychiatric disorders. Broadbent’s Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ), is among the most widely used scales to assess cognitive function observed in an ecological manner. Despite its wide use in research and correlation with biological markers, CFQ is criticized for its unstable factorial structure among studies and 5-Likert structure that may lead to bias for neutral answers. Here we aimed to develop a 4-Likert Turkish version of CFQ, search its validity, reliability and factorial structure. Material and Methods: CFQ has been translated to Turkish in two steps. CFQ, Perceived Deficit Questionnaire-D (PDQ-D), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) were applied to 272 participants (187 healthy controls, 55 patients diagnosed with depression, 30 patients diagnosed with anxiety disorder). Results: The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 4-Likert Turkish version of CFQ was found as 0.91. Principal component analysis extracted five factors and explained 53.7 % of total variance. CFQ scores were significantly different among groups. Both depressive and anxious groups reported higher CFQ scores compared to controls. CFQ significantly and strongly correlated with PDQ-D and showed a moderate correlation with BDI and BAI. Conclusion: 4-Likert Turkish version of CFQ is a valid and reliable tool to assess cognitive failures in non-demented groups. Our analysis revealed a five factorial structure for CFQ, however previous literature with the 5-Likert version shows different factor structures and does not indicate a dimensional stability.
dc.description.indexedbyTR Dizin
dc.description.issue6
dc.description.publisherscopeNational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.volume27
dc.identifier.doi10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.04.308
dc.identifier.eissn2636-7688
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.04.308
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/14940
dc.keywordsAnxiety
dc.keywordsCognitive failure
dc.keywordsDepression
dc.keywordsValidity / Anksiyete
dc.keywordsBilişsel başarısızlık
dc.keywordsDepresyon
dc.keywordsGeçerlilik
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherİnönü Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of Medical Research
dc.subjectAnxiety
dc.subjectDepressin
dc.subjectAnksiyete
dc.subjectDepresyon
dc.titleDevelopment, validity and reliability of the 4-point likert Turkish version of cognitive failures questionnaire
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorEser, Hale Yapıcı
local.contributor.kuauthorYalçınay-İnan, Merve
local.contributor.kuauthorKüçüker, Mehmet Utku
local.contributor.kuauthorKılçıksız, Can Mişel
local.contributor.kuauthorYılmaz, Sezen Güçlü
local.contributor.kuauthorDinçer, Neris
local.contributor.kuauthorKılıç, Özge
local.contributor.kuauthorErcan, Alaattin Cenk
local.publication.orgunit1SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
local.publication.orgunit1KUH (KOÇ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL)
local.publication.orgunit2KUH (Koç University Hospital)
local.publication.orgunit2School of Medicine
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationf91d21f0-6b13-46ce-939a-db68e4c8d2ab
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryf91d21f0-6b13-46ce-939a-db68e4c8d2ab
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication055775c9-9efe-43ec-814f-f6d771fa6dee
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery055775c9-9efe-43ec-814f-f6d771fa6dee

Files