Publication:
Biomechanical study on three screw-based atlantoaxial fixation techniques: a finite element study

dc.contributor.coauthorErbulut, D.U.
dc.contributor.coauthorMumtaz, M.
dc.contributor.coauthorZafarparandeh, I.
dc.contributor.kuauthorÖzer, Ali Fahir
dc.contributor.kuprofileFaculty Member
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.yokid1022
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T11:57:31Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractStudy design: this is a finite element study. Purpose: This study is aimed to compare the biomechanical behaviors of three screw-based atlantoaxial fixation techniques. Overview of literature: Screw-based constructs that are widely used to stabilize the atlantoaxial joint come with their own challenges in surgery. Clinical and in vitro studies have compared the effectiveness of screw-based constructs in joint fixation. Nevertheless, there is limited information regarding the biomechanical behavior of these constructs, such as the stresses and strains they experience. Methods: a finite element model of the upper cervical spine was developed. A type II dens fracture was induced in the intact model to produce the injured model. The following three constructs were simulated on the intact and injured models: transarticular screw (C1- C2TA), lateral mass screw in C1 and pedicle screw in C2 (C1LM1-C2PD), and lateral mass screw in C1 and translaminar screw in C2 (C1LM1-C2TL). Results: in the intact model, flexion-extension range of motion (ROM) was reduced by up to 99% with C11-C2TA and 98% with C1LM1-C2PD and C1LM1-C2TL. The lateral bending ROM in the intact model was reduced by 100%, 95%, and 75% with C11-C2TA, C1LM1-C2PD, and C1LM1-C2TL, respectively. The axial rotation ROM in the intact model was reduced by 99%, 98%, and 99% with C11-C2TA, C1LM1-C2PD, and C1LM1-C2TL, respectively. The largest maximum von Mises stress was predicted for C1LM1-C2TL (332 MPa) followed by C1LM1-C2PD (307 MPa) and C11-C2TA (133 MPa). Maximum stress was predicted to be at the lateral mass screw head of the C1LM1-C2TL construct. Conclusions: our model indicates that the biomechanical stability of the atlantoaxial joint in lateral bending with translaminar screws is not as reliable as that with transarticular and pedicle screws. Translaminar screws experience large stresses that may lead to failure of the construct before the required bony fusion occurs.
dc.description.fulltextYES
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.issue6
dc.description.openaccessYES
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.sponsorshipN/A
dc.description.versionPublisher version
dc.description.volume16
dc.formatpdf
dc.identifier.doi10.31616/asj.2021.0270
dc.identifier.eissn1976-7846
dc.identifier.embargoNO
dc.identifier.filenameinventorynoIR03620
dc.identifier.issn1976-1902
dc.identifier.linkhttps://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2021.0270
dc.identifier.quartileN/A
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85145952894
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/877
dc.identifier.wos798554200001
dc.keywordsAtlantoaxial fixation
dc.keywordsLateral mass screw
dc.keywordsPedicle screws
dc.keywordsScrew-based technique
dc.keywordsTransarticular screw
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherKorean Spine Society
dc.relation.grantnoNA
dc.relation.urihttp://cdm21054.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/IR/id/10478
dc.sourceAsian Spine Journal
dc.subjectOrthopedics
dc.titleBiomechanical study on three screw-based atlantoaxial fixation techniques: a finite element study
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.authorid0000-0001-7285-381X
local.contributor.kuauthorÖzer, Ali Fahir

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
10478.pdf
Size:
764.09 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format