Publication:
Risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury with fundal pressure in second stage of labor: transperineal ultrasound study

dc.contributor.coauthorÖncü, Hande N.
dc.contributor.coauthorArıoğlu, Çağrı
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.kuauthorAydın, Serdar
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSCHOOL OF MEDICINE
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T13:47:49Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractAims: clinical management of the second stage of labor and effectiveness of preventive measures for severe perineal tears are controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of using uterine fundal pressure during the second stage of delivery on obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI), among primiparous women using three-dimensional (3D) transperineal ultrasonography. Methods: a total of 73 women who had their first vaginal birth were included in the study, the fundal pressure group included women where the fundal pressure maneuver was applied (n = 37); and the control group included women who delivered spontaneously without fundal pressure (n = 36). Tomographic ultrasound imaging with 3D transperineal assessment was performed within 48 h of delivery, internal anal sphincter (IAS) and external anal sphincter (EAS) defect were determined. Results: five (13.5%) women in the fundal pressure group, seven (20%) women in the control group had complete EAS defect (p = 0.4). Complete IAS defect was observed in one (2.7%) woman in the fundal pressure group and two (5.7%) women in the control group (p = 0.5). A Half-moon sign was observed in one woman in both groups (p = 0.9). The rate of other signs was similar in both groups. Multivariate regression models revealed that none of age, fetal birth weight, episiotomy, length of the second stage of labor, fundal pressure application status, and number were independent predictors of complete IAS or EAS defect. Conclusion: fundal pressure with mediolateral episiotomy during the second stage of delivery does not increase the rate of OASI detected with ultrasonography.
dc.description.fulltextYES
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.issue5
dc.description.openaccessYES
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.sponsorshipN/A
dc.description.versionAuthor's final manuscript
dc.description.volume40
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/nau.24681
dc.identifier.eissn1520-6777
dc.identifier.embargoNO
dc.identifier.filenameinventorynoIR03231
dc.identifier.issn0733-2467
dc.identifier.quartileQ3
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85105031277
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/nau.24681
dc.identifier.wos646506200001
dc.keywordsFundal pressure
dc.keywordsObstetric anal sphincter injury
dc.keywordsPelvic floor
dc.keywordsTransperineal ultrasound
dc.keywordsVaginal delivery
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.grantnoNA
dc.relation.ispartofNeurourology and Urodynamics
dc.relation.urihttp://cdm21054.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/IR/id/10009
dc.subjectUrology
dc.subjectNephrology
dc.titleRisk of obstetric anal sphincter injury with fundal pressure in second stage of labor: transperineal ultrasound study
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorAydın, Serdar
local.publication.orgunit1SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
local.publication.orgunit2School of Medicine
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
10009.pdf
Size:
2.92 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format