Publication:
A novel preoperative cervical cerclage staging and the outcomes accordingly at a tertiary center

dc.contributor.coauthorUygur, L.
dc.contributor.coauthorTabakci, A.
dc.contributor.coauthorAyhan, I.
dc.contributor.coauthorSagkol, H.
dc.contributor.coauthorKarakus, R.
dc.contributor.coauthorKilicci, C.
dc.contributor.coauthorTosun, O.
dc.contributor.coauthorOzdemir, M. E.
dc.contributor.departmentKUH (Koç University Hospital)
dc.contributor.kuauthorÜnal, Ceren
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteKUH (KOÇ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL)
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-15T10:56:22Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractTo present a novel preoperative staging for cervical cerclage and the outcomes of the procedure according to this staging. The second aim is to identify the predictors of cerclage failure. Methods: This was a retrospective monocentric cohort study including 136 singleton pregnancies with cervical insufficiency who had undergone cervical cerclage. Preoperative examination findings, ultrasound results, and demographic data were obtained from hospital records. The patients were assigned to four main stages and seven substages according to their ultrasound and examination findings. Cerclage failure rates were detected, and the pregnancy outcomes and the factors that affect operation outcomes were evaluated in each stage. Results: The mean gestational age at birth was 34.1 ± 5.7 for the entire cohort. The mean cerclage‐to‐delivery interval was 15.4 ± 6.7 weeks. Shorter cervical length, sludge, cervical dilatation, prolapsed membranes into the cervical canal or vagina, and need for long‐term tocolysis (> 3 days) were associated with cerclage failure. No significant difference in pregnancy outcomes was detected between dilated and non‐dilated cervix, as long as the membranes were not prolapsed. Pregnancy outcomes differed significantly between the cases with prolapsed membranes above and below the external os. Conclusion: This staging system can assist obstetricians in preoperative counseling about individualized success chances for the operation and the risk factors that increase the risk of operation failure. As the stage advances, clinical factors related to infection seem to have more impact on outcomes.
dc.description.harvestedfromManual
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.sponsorshipN/A
dc.description.versionPublished Version
dc.identifier.ScopusPercentile52
dc.identifier.ScopusQuartileQ2
dc.identifier.WoSPercentile38.1
dc.identifier.WoSQuartileQ3
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jog.70474
dc.identifier.eissn1447-0756
dc.identifier.endpage-
dc.identifier.grantnoN/A
dc.identifier.issn1341-8076
dc.identifier.issue8
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105047968829
dc.identifier.startpage-
dc.identifier.urihttp://doi.org/10.1111/jog.70474
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/35497
dc.identifier.volume52
dc.keywordsEmergency cerclage
dc.keywordsPhysical exam indicated cerclage
dc.keywordsPrematurity
dc.keywordsPreterm birth
dc.keywordsProgesterone
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.affiliationKoç University
dc.relation.collectionKoç University Institutional Repository
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research
dc.relation.openaccessN/A
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.subjectObstetrics and gynecology
dc.subjectEpidemiology
dc.titleA novel preoperative cervical cerclage staging and the outcomes accordingly at a tertiary center
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationf91d21f0-6b13-46ce-939a-db68e4c8d2ab
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryf91d21f0-6b13-46ce-939a-db68e4c8d2ab
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication055775c9-9efe-43ec-814f-f6d771fa6dee
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery055775c9-9efe-43ec-814f-f6d771fa6dee

Files