Publication:
Recovery features in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow

dc.contributor.coauthorYildirim, Pelin
dc.contributor.coauthorYildirim, Apdullah
dc.contributor.coauthorEvcili, Gokhan
dc.contributor.coauthorKarahan, Ali Yavuz
dc.contributor.coauthorGunduz, Osman Hakan
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.facultymemberNo
dc.contributor.kuauthorMısırlıoğlu, Tuğçe Özekli
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSCHOOL OF MEDICINE
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T23:52:16Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This study evaluated the effect of age, sex, and entrapment localization on recovery time in patients treated conservatively for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Subjects: Thirty-five patients (16 women and 15 men) who were diagnosed with ulnar neuropathy at the elbow using short segment conduction studies were evaluated retrospectively. Methods: Definition of recovey was made based on patient satisfaction. The absence of symptoms was considered as the marker of recovery. Patients who recovered within 0-4 weeks were in Group 1, and patients who recovered within 4 weeks to 6 months were in Group 2. The differences between Group 1 and Group 2 in terms of age, sex and entrapment localization were investigated. Results: Entrapment was most frequent in the retroepicondylar groove (54.3%). No significant difference was found in terms of age and entrapment localizations between Groups 1 and 2. There was a statistically significant difference between the groups for the male sex. Conclusion: In ulnar neuropathy at the elbow, age and entrapment localization do not affect recovery time. However, male sex appears to be associated with longer recovery time.
dc.description.fulltextNo
dc.description.harvestedfromManual
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.openaccessYES
dc.description.peerreviewstatusN/A
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.readpublishN/A
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.studentonlypublicationNo
dc.description.studentpublicationNo
dc.description.versionN/A
dc.identifier.WoSQuartileQ4
dc.identifier.doi10.1589/jpts.27.1387
dc.identifier.eissn2187-5626
dc.identifier.embargoN/A
dc.identifier.endpage1389
dc.identifier.issn0915-5287
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.pubmed26157226
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84930018605
dc.identifier.startpage1387
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/14831
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.1387
dc.identifier.volume27
dc.identifier.wos000356074700026
dc.keywordsUlnar neuropathies
dc.keywordsElbow
dc.keywordsElectrodiagnosis
dc.keywordsShort segment conduction
dc.keywordsCubital tunnel-syndrome
dc.keywordsNerve
dc.keywordsManagement
dc.keywordsDiagnosis
dc.keywordsGender
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSociety of Physical Therapy Science
dc.relation.affiliationKoç University
dc.relation.collectionKoç University Institutional Repository
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Physical Therapy Science
dc.relation.openaccessN/A
dc.rightsN/A
dc.subjectRehabilitation
dc.titleRecovery features in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorMısırlıoğlu, Tuğçe Özekli
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e

Files