Publication: Reform or cataclysm? the agreement of 8 February 1914 regarding the ottoman eastern provinces
dc.contributor.coauthor | Kieser, Hans-Lukas | |
dc.contributor.coauthor | Polatel, Mehmet | |
dc.contributor.coauthor | Schmutz, Thomas | |
dc.contributor.department | Department of History | |
dc.contributor.kuauthor | Polatel, Mehmet | |
dc.contributor.kuprofile | Researcher | |
dc.contributor.other | Department of History | |
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstitute | College of Social Sciences and Humanities | |
dc.contributor.yokid | N/A | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-11-09T23:29:13Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.description.abstract | On 8 February 1914, Ottoman Grand Vizier Said Halim and the Russian charge d'affaires Konstantin Gulkevich signed a reform project for seven Ottoman eastern provinces that covered roughly half of Asia Minor. This international Reform Agreement differed considerably from a first Russian draft the year before. Though little known by most World War I historians in the West, this agreement was a central but fragile piece for the future of Ottoman coexistence in egalitarian terms in Asia Minor on the eve of World War I. Often called 'Armenian Reforms', it was also a last seminal, more or less consensual project of European diplomacy before the latter's breakdown in the July crisis of 1914. Important Ottoman and non-Ottoman protagonists then chose the road towards cataclysm instead of efforts for Ottoman coexistence, reform and international consensus building. The cataclysm of greater Europe in World War I produced various seminal outcomes. One main result in the Levant was a Turkish nation-state in Asia Minor that excluded Asia Minor's Christians and tried to assimilate non-Turkish Muslims, above all Kurds, into 'Turkdom'. This article argues that the agreement of 1914 had opened for a short time a completely different perspective and that it played a crucial role on the road that led to genocide in spring 1915. Its postulates are still topical. | |
dc.description.indexedby | WoS | |
dc.description.indexedby | Scopus | |
dc.description.issue | 3 | |
dc.description.openaccess | NO | |
dc.description.publisherscope | International | |
dc.description.volume | 17 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/14623528.2015.1062283 | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1469-9494 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1462-3528 | |
dc.identifier.quartile | Q3 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14623528.2015.1062283 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/12023 | |
dc.identifier.wos | 212140500003 | |
dc.keywords | Reform | |
dc.keywords | Cataclysm | |
dc.keywords | Ottoman eastern provinces | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | |
dc.source | Journal of Genocide Research | |
dc.subject | Political science | |
dc.title | Reform or cataclysm? the agreement of 8 February 1914 regarding the ottoman eastern provinces | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
local.contributor.authorid | N/A | |
local.contributor.kuauthor | Polatel, Mehmet | |
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | be8432df-d124-44c3-85b4-be586c2db8a3 | |
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | be8432df-d124-44c3-85b4-be586c2db8a3 |