Publication:
Temporal horizons in the study of Turkish politics: prevalence of non-causal description and seemingly global warming type of causality

dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of International Relations
dc.contributor.kuauthorAktürk, Şener
dc.contributor.kuprofileFaculty Member
dc.contributor.otherDepartment of International Relations
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteCollege of Administrative Sciences and Economics
dc.contributor.yokid110043
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T23:04:12Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractIn this article, I critically evaluate the causal and temporal dimension of social scientific studies focusing on Turkish politics. A very important and yet often neglected aspect of social scientific analysis involves the temporal dimension of causal processes. The temporal dimension of causal processes has direct consequences for operationalization and measurement, and hence it is an essential component of research design. Does the dependent variable (outcome) of interest unfold over the short term or the long term? Do the hypothesized independent variables (causes) unfold over the short term or the long term? Paul Pierson (2004) provided a classification of four types of causality based on the temporal dimension of causes and outcomes using metaphors of natural disasters: tornado, earthquake, meteorite, and global warming. Operationalization and measurement of long term causes and outcomes pose a major challenge, compounded by the challenges of periodization of causes and effects. Unfortunately, a large proportion of the studies of Turkish politics do not have a clearly discernible independent variable (cause) to begin with, and they are thus better characterized as works of "non-causal description." Moreover, many of the studies of Turkish politics tend to imply, but rarely state explicitly, a global warming type of causality (long term cause and long term outcome), which necessitates focusing even more intensively on such challenges of measurement and periodization. Yet the operationalization of the key (dependent and independent) variables is often missing even in articles published in reputable academic journals of Turkish politics and society. In the spirit of constructive criticism, I suggest a number of guidelines for research design in order to address the problems of causality and temporality discussed in this article, including awareness of multi-temporal equifinality.
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyTR Dizin
dc.description.issue2
dc.description.openaccessYES
dc.description.publisherscopeNational
dc.description.volume8
dc.identifier.doiN/A
dc.identifier.issn2146-7757
dc.identifier.linkhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85081654276&partnerID=40&md5=a6a052f506581874ae48f2072dc821f6
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85081654276
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/8585
dc.identifier.wos473342000002
dc.keywordsCausality
dc.keywordsConceptualization
dc.keywordsOperationalization
dc.keywordsPeriodization
dc.keywordsTemporality
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherCenter Foreign Policy & Peace Research
dc.sourceAll Azimuth
dc.subjectInternational Relations
dc.titleTemporal horizons in the study of Turkish politics: prevalence of non-causal description and seemingly global warming type of causality
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.authorid0000-0002-5897-6714
local.contributor.kuauthorAktürk, Şener
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication9fc25a77-75a8-48c0-8878-02d9b71a9126
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery9fc25a77-75a8-48c0-8878-02d9b71a9126

Files