<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Publication:
Impact of adding the immune checkpoint inhibitor atezolizumab to first-line chemotherapy on progression-free survival in poor-prognosis ovarian cancer: a retrospective analysis from the IMagyn050 trial

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Departments

Item type:Organizational Unit,
Item type:Organizational Unit,

School / College / Institute

Item type:Organizational Unit,
SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
Upper Org Unit
Item type:Organizational Unit,

Program

Organization Authors

Co-Authors

You, Benoit

Anderson, Charles

Cecere, Sabrina Chiara

Carrot, Aurore

Myers, Tashanna

Heitz, Florian

Sharma, Sudarshan

Aghajanian, Carol

Fernebro, Josefin

Blank, Stephanie

Date

Language

Embargo Status

No

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Alternative Title

Abstract

Purpose: Adding the anti-PD-L1 antibody atezolizumab to frontline chemotherapy-bevacizumab regimen did not improve progression-free survival (PFS) in ovarian cancer (OC) patients in IMagyn050 trial. This post-hoc analysis assessed the efficacy of atezolizumab in a subgroup of patients with particularly poor prognosis, as defined by the GCIG meta-analysis—characterized by a poor chemosensitivity and a suboptimal surgical resection. Methodology: This analysis included 1199 evaluable participants with ≥3 available CA-125 concentrations, as required for KELIM score. The prognostic factors were identified through univariable and multivariable analyses. If both the KELIM score (unfavorable <1.0, vs favorable ≥1.0) and surgical outcome (suboptimal, vs optimal resection) demonstrated independent prognostic value, they were to be combined into prognostic subgroups. The PFS benefit of atezolizumab versus placebo was then evaluated within each of these defined subgroups. Results: Both the KELIM score and surgical outcome were independent prognostic factors. Combining these two parameters generated three distinct prognostic subgroups. In the poor prognosis subgroup (n = 269), defined by both an unfavorable KELIM score (<1.0) and suboptimal cytoreduction, the addition of atezolizumab was associated with a significantly longer median PFS compared to placebo (14.3 vs 11.3 months; HR 0.75, 95 % CI 0.59–0.95). This benefit was observed in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. No significant PFS benefit was observed in the other prognostic subgroups. Conclusion: The poor prognostic OC patient subgroup, may have an extension of PFS from treatment intensification with atezolizumab added to frontline chemotherapy-bevacizumab regimen. This hypothesis-generating outcome warrants further understanding on the added role of ICI in the frontline setting.

Source

Publisher

Academic Press Inc.

Citation

item.page.haspartof

Source

Gynecologic Oncology

item.page.ispartofseries

item.page.edition

DOI

10.1016/j.ygyno.2025.04.577

item.page.datauri

item.page.link

Rights

CC BY (Attribution)

Copyrights Note

Creative Commons license

Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC BY (Attribution)

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Patent

Related Goal

Google Scholar
Scholar'da Ara ↗
0
Görüntülenme
1
İndirme
Altmetric
Dimensions
PlumX Metrikleri
BIP! Indicators