Publication:
ESCMID COVID-19 guidelines: diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2

Thumbnail Image

School / College / Institute

Organizational Unit
Organizational Unit
SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
Upper Org Unit

Program

KU-Authors

KU Authors

Co-Authors

Fragkou, Paraskevi C.
De Angelis, Giulia
Menchinelli, Giulia
Garcia, Federico
Morfin-Sherpa, Florence
Dimopoulou, Dimitra
Mack, Elisabeth
de Salazar, Adolfo
Grossi, Adriano
Lytras, Theodore

Publication Date

Language

Embargo Status

NO

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Alternative Title

Abstract

Scope: the objective of these guidelines is to identify the most appropriate diagnostic test and/or diagnostic approach for SARS-CoV-2. The recommendations are intended to provide guidance to clinicians, clinical microbiologists, other health care personnel, and decision makers. Methods: an ESCMID COVID-19 guidelines task force was established by the ESCMID Executive Committee. A small group was established, half appointed by the chair and the remaining selected with an open call. Each panel met virtually once a week. For all decisions, a simple majority vote was used. A list of clinical questions using the PICO (population, intervention, comparison, outcome) format was developed at the beginning of the process. For each PICO, two panel members performed a literature search focusing on systematic reviews, with a third panellist involved in case of inconsistent results. Quality of evidence assessment was based on the GRADE-ADOLOPMENT (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation - adoption, adaptation, and de novo development of recommendations) approach. Recommendations: a total of 43 PICO questions were selected that involve the following types of populations: (a) patients with signs and symptoms of COVID-19; (b) travellers, healthcare workers, and other individuals at risk for exposure to SARS-CoV-2; (c) asymptomatic individuals, and (d) close contacts of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. The type of diagnostic test (commercial rapid nucleic acid amplification tests and rapid antigen detection), biomaterial, time since onset of symptoms/contact with an infectious case, age, disease severity, and risk of developing severe disease are also taken into consideration.

Source

Publisher

Elsevier

Subject

Nasopharyngeal swabs, Serologic tests, COVID-19

Citation

Has Part

Source

Clinical Microbiology and Infection

Book Series Title

Edition

DOI

10.1016/j.cmi.2022.02.011

item.page.datauri

Link

Rights

Copyrights Note

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

0

Views

3

Downloads

View PlumX Details