Publication: ESCMID COVID-19 guidelines: diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2
Files
Program
KU-Authors
KU Authors
Co-Authors
Fragkou, Paraskevi C.
De Angelis, Giulia
Menchinelli, Giulia
Garcia, Federico
Morfin-Sherpa, Florence
Dimopoulou, Dimitra
Mack, Elisabeth
de Salazar, Adolfo
Grossi, Adriano
Lytras, Theodore
Publication Date
Language
Type
Embargo Status
NO
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Alternative Title
Abstract
Scope: the objective of these guidelines is to identify the most appropriate diagnostic test and/or diagnostic approach for SARS-CoV-2. The recommendations are intended to provide guidance to clinicians, clinical microbiologists, other health care personnel, and decision makers. Methods: an ESCMID COVID-19 guidelines task force was established by the ESCMID Executive Committee. A small group was established, half appointed by the chair and the remaining selected with an open call. Each panel met virtually once a week. For all decisions, a simple majority vote was used. A list of clinical questions using the PICO (population, intervention, comparison, outcome) format was developed at the beginning of the process. For each PICO, two panel members performed a literature search focusing on systematic reviews, with a third panellist involved in case of inconsistent results. Quality of evidence assessment was based on the GRADE-ADOLOPMENT (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation - adoption, adaptation, and de novo development of recommendations) approach. Recommendations: a total of 43 PICO questions were selected that involve the following types of populations: (a) patients with signs and symptoms of COVID-19; (b) travellers, healthcare workers, and other individuals at risk for exposure to SARS-CoV-2; (c) asymptomatic individuals, and (d) close contacts of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. The type of diagnostic test (commercial rapid nucleic acid amplification tests and rapid antigen detection), biomaterial, time since onset of symptoms/contact with an infectious case, age, disease severity, and risk of developing severe disease are also taken into consideration.
Source
Publisher
Elsevier
Subject
Nasopharyngeal swabs, Serologic tests, COVID-19
Citation
Has Part
Source
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
Book Series Title
Edition
DOI
10.1016/j.cmi.2022.02.011