Publication:
Comparative analysis of the spatial distribution of brain metastases across several primary cancers using machine learning and deep learning models

dc.contributor.coauthorMahmoodifar, Saeedeh
dc.contributor.coauthorPangal, Dhiraj J.
dc.contributor.coauthorNeman, Josh
dc.contributor.coauthorZada, Gabriel
dc.contributor.coauthorMason, Jeremy
dc.contributor.coauthorSalhia, Bodour
dc.contributor.coauthorKaisman-Elbaz, Tehila
dc.contributor.coauthorHamel, Andreanne
dc.contributor.coauthorMathieu, David
dc.contributor.coauthorTripathi, Manjul
dc.contributor.coauthorSheehan, Jason
dc.contributor.coauthorPikis, Stylianos
dc.contributor.coauthorMantziaris, Georgios
dc.contributor.coauthorNewton, Paul K.
dc.contributor.kuauthorPeker, Selçuk
dc.contributor.kuauthorSamancı, Mustafa Yavuz
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSchool of Medicine
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-29T09:38:33Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractObjectiveBrain metastases (BM) are associated with poor prognosis and increased mortality rates, making them a significant clinical challenge. Studying BMs can aid in improving early detection and monitoring. Systematic comparisons of anatomical distributions of BM from different primary cancers, however, remain largely unavailable.MethodsTo test the hypothesis that anatomical BM distributions differ based on primary cancer type, we analyze the spatial coordinates of BMs for five different primary cancer types along principal component (PC) axes. The dataset includes 3949 intracranial metastases, labeled by primary cancer types and with six features. We employ PC coordinates to highlight the distinctions between various cancer types. We utilized different Machine Learning (ML) algorithms (RF, SVM, TabNet DL) models to establish the relationship between primary cancer diagnosis, spatial coordinates of BMs, age, and target volume.ResultsOur findings revealed that PC1 aligns most with the Y axis, followed by the Z axis, and has minimal correlation with the X axis. Based on PC1 versus PC2 plots, we identified notable differences in anatomical spreading patterns between Breast and Lung cancer, as well as Breast and Renal cancer. In contrast, Renal and Lung cancer, as well as Lung and Melanoma, showed similar patterns. Our ML and DL results demonstrated high accuracy in distinguishing BM distribution for different primary cancers, with the SVM algorithm achieving 97% accuracy using a polynomial kernel and TabNet achieving 96%. The RF algorithm ranked PC1 as the most important discriminating feature.ConclusionsIn summary, our results support accurate multiclass ML classification regarding brain metastases distribution.
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.issue3
dc.description.openaccessGreen Submitted
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsorsNo Statement Available
dc.description.volume167
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11060-024-04630-5
dc.identifier.eissn1573-7373
dc.identifier.issn0167-594X
dc.identifier.quartileQ2
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85189208354
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-024-04630-5
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/22726
dc.identifier.wos1195700800007
dc.keywordsBrain metastases
dc.keywordsPrincipal components
dc.keywordsDeep learning models
dc.keywordsPan cancer analysis
dc.languageen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.grantnoNational Institutes of Health
dc.sourceJournal of Neuro-Oncology
dc.subjectOncology
dc.subjectClinical neurology
dc.titleComparative analysis of the spatial distribution of brain metastases across several primary cancers using machine learning and deep learning models
dc.typeJournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorPeker, Selçuk
local.contributor.kuauthorSamancı, Mustafa Yavuz

Files