Publication:
Surgical approaches for papillary microcarcinomas: Turkey's perspective

dc.contributor.coauthorMakay, Özer
dc.contributor.coauthorOzdemir, Murat
dc.contributor.coauthorŞenyürek, Yasemin Giles
dc.contributor.coauthorTunca, Fatih
dc.contributor.coauthorDuren, Mete
dc.contributor.coauthorUludağ, Mehmet
dc.contributor.coauthorHacıyanlı, Mehmet
dc.contributor.coauthorİçözz, Göokhan
dc.contributor.coauthorİşgör, Adnan
dc.contributor.coauthorÖzbaş, Serdar
dc.contributor.coauthorÖzcan, Zehra
dc.contributor.departmentN/A
dc.contributor.kuauthorTezelman, Tevfik Serdar
dc.contributor.kuprofileFaculty Member
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.yokid114860
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T22:57:29Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The incidence of papillary microcarcinomas, which are defined as thyroid cancers of <10mm in size, has been increasing in the last decade. Herein, we present internet-based questionnaire results performed by the Turkish Association of Endocrine Surgery with the aim to evaluate the perspective of the management of papillary microcarcinomas in Turkey. Material and Methods: The user-friendly questionnaire consisted of 13 questions in total. These questions mainly addressed the surgical management of nodules and cancer of <1 cm in size. Patient management before, during, and after surgical intervention was also included; additionally, the "active surveillance approach" was questioned. Results: There were 420 responders in total who were of multidisciplinary origin (endocrinologists, surgeons, nuclear medicine specialists, pathologists, and oncologists). Total thyroidectomy was the predominant treatment approach (65%) for the classical type of microcarcinoma limited in one lobe, whereas in cases of microcarcinomas incidentally diagnosed during hemithyroidectomy, complementary surgery approach was advised by 40% of the responders. The responders found capsule invasion (86%) and patient based management (94%) of high importance. The percentage of the responders who recommended radioactive iodine ablation in incidental cancers having no aggressive criteria was 51%. The survey participants that were against routine central dissection in these cases accounted for 73% of the responders. The recommendation of active surveillance (follow-up without any interventional therapy) was limited with 9% responders. Conclusion: The results of the questionnaire demonstrated that there have been various choices in Turkey for the surgical treatment of the papillary microcarcinomas.
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.indexedbyTR Dizin
dc.description.issue2
dc.description.openaccessYES
dc.description.publisherscopeNational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.volume34
dc.identifier.doi10.5152/turkjsurg.2018.3596
dc.identifier.eissn2564-7032
dc.identifier.issn2564-6850
dc.identifier.quartileN/A
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85049808867
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.5152/turkjsurg.2018.3596
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/7559
dc.identifier.wos440304500003
dc.keywordsPapillary microcarcinoma
dc.keywordsTurkey
dc.keywordsThyroidectomy
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherAves
dc.sourceTurkish Journal of Surgery
dc.subjectSurgery
dc.titleSurgical approaches for papillary microcarcinomas: Turkey's perspective
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.authorid0000-0003-2255-527X
local.contributor.kuauthorTezelman, Tevfik Serdar

Files