Publication: Radiogenomics of lower-grade gliomas: machine learning–based MRI texture analysis for predicting 1p/19q codeletion status
Program
KU-Authors
KU Authors
Co-Authors
Koçak, Burak
Durmaz, Emine Sebnem
Ates, Ece
Sel, Ipek
Gunes, Saime Turgut
Zeynalova, Amalya
Kilickesmez, Ozgur
Advisor
Publication Date
Language
English
Type
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the potential value of the machine learning (ML)-based MRI texture analysis for predicting 1p/19q codeletion status of lower-grade gliomas (LGG), using various state-of-the-art ML algorithms. Materials and methods For this retrospective study, 107 patients with LGG were included from a public database. Texture features were extracted from conventional T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI images, using LIFEx software. Training and unseen validation splits were created using stratified 10-fold cross-validation technique along with minority over-sampling. Dimension reduction was done using collinearity analysis and feature selection (ReliefF). Classifications were done using adaptive boosting, k-nearest neighbours, naive Bayes, neural network, random forest, stochastic gradient descent, and support vector machine. Friedman test and pairwise post hoc analyses were used for comparison of classification performances based on the area under the curve (AUC). Results Overall, the predictive performance of the ML algorithms were statistically significantly different, chi 2(6) = 26.7, p < 0.001. There was no statistically significant difference among the performance of the neural network, naive Bayes, support vector machine, random forest, and stochastic gradient descent, adjusted p > 0.05. The mean AUC and accuracy values of these five algorithms ranged from 0.769 to 0.869 and from 80.1 to 84%, respectively. The neural network had the highest mean rank with mean AUC and accuracy values of 0.869 and 83.8%, respectively. Conclusions The ML-based MRI texture analysis might be a promising non-invasive technique for predicting the 1p/19q codeletion status of LGGs. Using this technique along with various ML algorithms, more than four-fifths of the LGGs can be correctly classified.
Source:
European Radiology
Publisher:
Springer
Keywords:
Subject
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine, Medical Imaging