Publication:
Utilization and fertility preservation outcomes in women undergoing embryo cryopreservation before breast cancer treatment: a meta-analysis

dc.contributor.coauthorTuran V
dc.contributor.coauthorBang H
dc.contributor.coauthorOktay KH.
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.kuauthorÖktem, Özgür
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSCHOOL OF MEDICINE
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-10T05:01:38Z
dc.date.available2025-09-09
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractOur aim was to assess fertility preservation (the proportion of women who had at least 1 live birth) and utilization rates (the proportion of women who utilized their cryopreserved embryos) rates among women who cryopreserved their embryos before breast cancer treatments. PubMed and Cochrane library database were searched until December 2024. We included all studies that reported pregnancy outcomes, the number of women who returned for frozen embryo transfer, and the number of women who preserved their fertility. The primary outcome measures were the utilization and fertility preservation rates. Secondary outcome measures were implantation, clinical pregnancy, and live birth rates. Of the 12 studies, 9 met the criteria, encompassing > 2126 women with breast cancer who cryopreserved their embryos for fertility preservation. In 9 studies that reported the total number of attempts, 424 women underwent 863 embryo transfers. Based on those studies, the clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were 50% (95% CI: 35-65, I-2 : 80%) and 33% (95% CI: 22-46, I-2 : 76%), respectively. The utilization and fertility preservation rates were 18% (95% CI: 9-32, I-2 : 95%) and 39% (95% CI: 29-51, I-2 : 48%), respectively, all from random-effects models. Fertility preservation success with embryos cryopreserved before breast cancer treatments seems to be promising. However, the utilization rate of cryopreserved embryos is low. Additional studies with larger sample size and longer follow up are required to evaluate the long-term utility rates. (c) 2025 Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
dc.description.fulltextNo
dc.description.harvestedfromManual
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.readpublishN/A
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.clbc.2025.06.003
dc.identifier.eissn1938-0666
dc.identifier.embargoNo
dc.identifier.issn1526-8209
dc.identifier.issue7
dc.identifier.pubmed40603132
dc.identifier.quartileQ3
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105009594956
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2025.06.003
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/30544
dc.identifier.volume25
dc.identifier.wos001602615900004
dc.keywordsFertility preservation
dc.keywordsBreast cancer
dc.keywordsPregnancy outcome
dc.keywordsLive birth
dc.keywordsFrozen embryo transfer
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.affiliationKoç University
dc.relation.collectionKoç University Institutional Repository
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Breast Cancer
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titleUtilization and fertility preservation outcomes in women undergoing embryo cryopreservation before breast cancer treatment: a meta-analysis
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
person.familyNameÖktem
person.givenNameÖzgür
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e

Files