Publication:
Numerical error monitoring

dc.contributor.departmentN/A
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Psychology
dc.contributor.kuauthorDuyan, Yalçın Akın
dc.contributor.kuauthorBalcı, Fuat
dc.contributor.kuprofilePhD Student
dc.contributor.kuprofileFaculty Member
dc.contributor.otherDepartment of Psychology
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteGraduate School of Social Sciences and Humanities
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteCollege of Social Sciences and Humanities
dc.contributor.yokidN/A
dc.contributor.yokid51269
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T23:06:10Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractError monitoring has recently been discovered to have informationally rich foundations in the timing domain. Based on the common properties of magnitude-based representations, we hypothesized that judgments on the direction and the magnitude of errors would also reflect their objective counterparts in the numerosity domain. In two experiments, we presented fast sequences of "beeps" with random interstimulus intervals and asked participants to stop the sequence when they thought the target count (7, 11, or 19) had been reached. Participants then judged how close to the target they stopped the sequence, and whether their response undershot or overshot the target. Individual linear regression fits as well as the linear mixed model with a fixed effect of reproduced numerosity on confidence ratings, and participants as independent random effects on the intercept and the slope, revealed significant positive slopes for all the target numerosities. Our results suggest that humans can keep track of the direction and degree of errors in the estimation of discrete quantities, pointing at a numerical-error-monitoring ability.
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.issue4
dc.description.openaccessYES
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsorshipTurkish Academy of Sciences (TUBA GEBIP 2015) This work was supported by the Turkish Academy of Sciences (TUBA GEBIP 2015) to F.B.
dc.description.volume25
dc.identifier.doi10.3758/s13423-018-1506-x
dc.identifier.eissn1531-5320
dc.identifier.issn1069-9384
dc.identifier.quartileQ1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85049589966
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-1506-x
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/8934
dc.identifier.wos440461800032
dc.keywordsError monitoring
dc.keywordsNumber estimation
dc.keywordsMetacognition
dc.keywordsMagnitude estimation humans
dc.keywordsTime
dc.keywordsMetacognition
dc.keywordsPsychophysics
dc.keywordsComputation
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.sourcePsychonomic Bulletin & Review
dc.subjectPsychology
dc.subjectMathematical
dc.subjectExperimental
dc.titleNumerical error monitoring
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.authorid0000-0002-4527-0165
local.contributor.authorid0000-0003-3390-9352
local.contributor.kuauthorDuyan, Yalçın Akın
local.contributor.kuauthorBalcı, Fuat
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd5fc0361-3a0a-4b96-bf2e-5cd6b2b0b08c
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd5fc0361-3a0a-4b96-bf2e-5cd6b2b0b08c

Files