Publication:
Long-term obstetric, perinatal, and surgical complications in singleton pregnancies following previous cesarean myomectomy: a retrospective multicentric study

dc.contributor.coauthorGüler, Oğuz
dc.contributor.coauthorHatırnaz, Şafak
dc.contributor.coauthorSparic, Radmila
dc.contributor.coauthorBasbuğ, Alper
dc.contributor.coauthorErol, Onur
dc.contributor.coauthorUlubaşoğlu, Hasan
dc.contributor.coauthorTrojano, Giuseppe
dc.contributor.coauthorÜrkmez, Sebati Sinan
dc.contributor.coauthorTinelli, Andrea
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.kuauthorKalkan, Üzeyir
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSCHOOL OF MEDICINE
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-29T09:37:36Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractObjectives The safety of cesarean myomectomy has been proven by previous studies. Our study aimed to reveal the long-term perinatal, obstetric, and surgical outcomes of cesarean myomectomy (CM) by comparing different CM techniques. Material and methods This retrospective multicentric case-control study involved 7 hospitals and included 226 singleton pregnancies that underwent repeated cesarean section (CS) between 2015 and 2020. Among these pregnancies, 113 of 226 cases had CM (Group A), and 113 had only CS (Group B). Of the 113 cases in which CM was performed, 58 underwent endometrial myomectomy (EM) (Subgroup A1) and 55 underwent serosal myomectomy (SM) (Subgroup A2). The groups were compared in terms of obstetric, perinatal, and surgical outcomes, and fibroid recurrence, myomectomy scar healing rate, and adhesion formation were noted. Results There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of maternal age, body mass index, gravidity, parity, and fibroid diameter in previous CS (p > 0.05). In the perinatal and obstetric evaluation of the groups, there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of neonatal weight, Apgar score, fetal growth restriction, preterm premature rupture of membranes, preterm delivery, hypertension in pregnancy, and diabetes mellitus (p > 0.05). The fibroid recurrence rate was 28.3%, and the myomectomy scar good healing rate was 99.1%. There was no difference between the groups in terms of CS duration, preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin levels, perioperative blood transfusion rates, febrile morbidity, and prolonged hospitalization (p > 0.05). In terms of adhesion formation, although the adhesion rate of the SM group was higher than that of the EM group, no statistically significant difference was detected between the groups. Conclusion This study showed that in pregnancies following CM, obstetrical, perinatal, and surgical outcomes were unaffected. Obstetricians can safely use CM, either the trans-endometrial or serosal technique, as it is a safe and effective method with long-term results.
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.openaccessgold
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.volume11
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fsurg.2024.1430439
dc.identifier.issn2296-875X
dc.identifier.quartileQ2
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1430439
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/22414
dc.identifier.wos1291518700001
dc.keywordsCesarean myomectomy
dc.keywordsEndometrial myomectomy
dc.keywordsSerosal myomectomy
dc.keywordsUterine fibroids
dc.keywordsMyoma recurrence
dc.keywordsPregnancy
dc.keywordsAdhesions
dc.keywordsComplications
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherFrontiers Media Sa
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in surgery
dc.subjectSurgery
dc.titleLong-term obstetric, perinatal, and surgical complications in singleton pregnancies following previous cesarean myomectomy: a retrospective multicentric study
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorKalkan, Üzeyir
local.publication.orgunit1SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
local.publication.orgunit2School of Medicine
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
IR04660.pdf
Size:
305.07 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format