Publication:
Efficacy and safety of systemic regimens for resectable gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

dc.contributor.coauthorNohmi, R. L.
dc.contributor.coauthorMamede, I.
dc.contributor.coauthorHoffmann Da Silva, R.
dc.contributor.coauthorSilva, G. B. E.
dc.contributor.coauthorSimoes, A. R.
dc.contributor.coauthorFernandes, G. D. S.
dc.contributor.coauthorAndrade, M. D. O.
dc.contributor.departmentKUH (Koç University Hospital)
dc.contributor.kuauthorAliyeva, Türkan
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteKUH (KOÇ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL)
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-17T08:28:57Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractPerioperative systemic therapy is the standard of care for resectable locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma. The emergence of multiple chemoimmunotherapy regimens warrants updated comparative evaluation. Methods A systematic review identified randomized controlled trials evaluating systemic therapy strategies for resectable locally advanced G/GEJ adenocarcinoma. Chemoradiotherapy-based approaches were not included. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), grade 3–4 adverse events, treatment-related discontinuation, and treatment-related deaths were analyzed. A Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis was conducted, with treatment rankings based on surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). Results Across 30 trials (11,547 patients), sixteen strategies were compared. Perioperative taxane-based triplet chemotherapy (P-Trp-Tax) plus an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) ranked highest for OS (SUCRA = 0.952) and DFS (SUCRA = 0.959). P-Trp-Tax + ICI showed a numerically favorable trend compared with P-Trp-Tax for OS (HR 0.79; 95% CrI, 0.59–1.05), although the estimate was imprecise. A more consistent benefit was observed for DFS (HR 0.72; 95% CrI, 0.56–0.93). Comparisons versus P-Dbl + ICI were imprecise (OS HR 0.76; 95% CrI, 0.45–1.26; DFS HR 0.74; 95% CrI, 0.46–1.19). Toxicity profiles were consistent with known patterns, without increased high-grade adverse events with ICIs, with estimates limited by heterogeneity and sparse data. Conclusions P-Trp-Tax + ICI had the highest probability of being among the most effective strategies in this analysis. These findings suggest a potential benefit of treatment intensification, but should be interpreted with caution given reliance on indirect comparisons, limited direct evidence for key regimens, and wide credible intervals for several estimates.
dc.description.harvestedfromManual
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.readpublishN/A
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.versionPublished Version
dc.identifier.WoSQuartileQ1
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.critrevonc.2026.105359
dc.identifier.eissn1879-0461
dc.identifier.embargoN/A
dc.identifier.issn1040-8428
dc.identifier.pubmed42140459
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105042555454
dc.identifier.urihttp://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2026.105359
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/33428
dc.identifier.volume225
dc.identifier.wos001806889900001
dc.keywordsGastric cancer
dc.keywordsGastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma
dc.keywordsPerioperative chemotherapy
dc.keywordsImmune checkpoint inhibitors
dc.keywordsSurvival outcomes
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.affiliationKoç University
dc.relation.collectionKoç University Institutional Repository
dc.relation.ispartofCritical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
dc.relation.openaccessN/A
dc.rightsN/A
dc.rights.uriN/A
dc.subjectOncology
dc.titleEfficacy and safety of systemic regimens for resectable gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
dc.typeReview
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationf91d21f0-6b13-46ce-939a-db68e4c8d2ab
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryf91d21f0-6b13-46ce-939a-db68e4c8d2ab
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication055775c9-9efe-43ec-814f-f6d771fa6dee
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery055775c9-9efe-43ec-814f-f6d771fa6dee

Files