Publication:
The effect of the use of complex molecular profiling in advanced solid organ tumours on clinical decision: Turkey molecular profiling in advanced cancers trial (TUMPACT)

dc.contributor.coauthorÖlmez, O. F.
dc.contributor.coauthorBilici, Ahmet
dc.contributor.coauthorEr, Ö.
dc.contributor.coauthorSevinç, A.
dc.contributor.coauthorAkman, T.
dc.contributor.coauthorUslu, Rüçhan
dc.contributor.coauthorMandel, N. M.
dc.contributor.coauthorYalçın, Şuayip
dc.contributor.coauthorTeomete, M.
dc.contributor.coauthorGörümlü, G.
dc.contributor.coauthorDemir, Atakan
dc.contributor.coauthorNamal, E.
dc.contributor.coauthorAlıcı, Sena
dc.contributor.coauthorBavbek, S.
dc.contributor.coauthorPaksoy, F.
dc.contributor.coauthorBaşaran, G.
dc.contributor.coauthorÖzer, L.
dc.contributor.coauthorŞener, N.
dc.contributor.coauthorHarputluoğlu, Hakan
dc.contributor.departmentKUH (Koç University Hospital)
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.kuauthorSelçukbiricik, Fatih
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteKUH (KOÇ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL)
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSCHOOL OF MEDICINE
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T23:18:12Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractBackground: Molecular genetic profiling (MGP) which has started to take an important part in cancer diagnosis and treatment in recent years, has entered the routine clinical practice much faster than expected. We aimed to evaluate the use of this technology in routine practice, the effect of changing the treatment decision. Methods: Two hundred and thirty-four patients who received treatment from 21 different centers with OncoDeep MGP platform tests were included, which uses a combination of new generation sequencing (NGS), immunohistochemistry (IHC) and other specific tests (Package Plus). Results: Summary was given in the table. Physician waited for test results in 27% (n=61) of patients for treatment decision. Prior to MGP analysis patients received median 2-lines of treatment. The median time between sending the sample abroad for testing and reaching the result by the physician was 14 days (range:5-71). With the test results, the physician changed the treatment decision in 51.8% of the patients (n=118). The most frequent way of drug supply of patients whose treatment decision were 64.4% (n = 67) from their own budget. When the treatment responses were evaluated, the disease control rate was 31.1% and the drug discontinuation was applied due to toxicity in 4 patients (3.4%). 63.6% (n = 75) of the patients were found to be alive with a median follow-up of 18.0 months. (Table)
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.openaccessYES
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.volume31
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.1314
dc.identifier.eissn1569-8041
dc.identifier.issn0923-7534
dc.identifier.quartileQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.1314
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/10347
dc.identifier.wos573469102591
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of Oncology
dc.subjectOncology
dc.titleThe effect of the use of complex molecular profiling in advanced solid organ tumours on clinical decision: Turkey molecular profiling in advanced cancers trial (TUMPACT)
dc.typeMeeting Abstract
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorSelçukbiricik, Fatih
local.publication.orgunit1SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
local.publication.orgunit1KUH (KOÇ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL)
local.publication.orgunit2KUH (Koç University Hospital)
local.publication.orgunit2School of Medicine
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationf91d21f0-6b13-46ce-939a-db68e4c8d2ab
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryf91d21f0-6b13-46ce-939a-db68e4c8d2ab
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication055775c9-9efe-43ec-814f-f6d771fa6dee
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery055775c9-9efe-43ec-814f-f6d771fa6dee

Files