Publication:
Selection of distal fusion level in terms of distal junctional kyphosis in Scheuermann kyphosis. A comparison of 3 methods

dc.contributor.coauthorDikici, Fatih
dc.contributor.coauthorAkgül, Turgut
dc.contributor.coauthorSarıyılmaz, Kerim
dc.contributor.coauthorÖzkunt, Okan
dc.contributor.coauthorSar, Cuneyt
dc.contributor.coauthorDomaniç, Ünsal
dc.contributor.departmentN/A
dc.contributor.kuauthorKorkmaz, Murat
dc.contributor.kuprofileDoctor
dc.contributor.unitKoç University Hospital
dc.contributor.yokid168011
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T23:23:15Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of distal fusion level selection on the distal junctional kyphosis (DJK) in Scheuermann kyphosis (SK) patients who underwent posterior fusion. Methods: Thirty-nine SK patients who underwent posterior fusion with a minimum follow-up of 3 years were retrospectively evaluated. According to the distal fusion level, patients were divided into 3 groups. Group S; lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) was the sagittal stable vertebra (SSV), Group F; LIV was the first lordotic vertebra (FLV) and, Group L; LIV was the lower end vertebra (LEV). DJK was evaluated according to distal level selection. Results: Thoracic kyphosis (TK) decreased from 73.3 degrees (SD +/- 7.9 degrees) to 39 degrees (SD +/- 8.7 degrees) postoperatively, with a mean correction rate of 46% (SD +/- 13) (p < 0.0001). In 11 patients, FLV and SSV was the same vertebra. In remaining 28 patients, 10 patients were in Group S, 15 patients were in Group F and 3 patients were in Group L. In Group S, none of them developed DJK, however, DJK was observed 9 of 15 patients in Group F. DJK was developed in all cases in Group L. There is a statistically higher risk for developing DJK when FLV or LEV was selected as LIV (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Selecting SSV for the distal fusion level has been found to be effective for preventing DJK. Selecting distal fusion level proximal to SSV will increase the risk of DJK which may become symptomatic and require revision surgery.
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.indexedbyTR Dizin
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.openaccessYES
dc.description.publisherscopeNational
dc.description.volume52
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.aott.2017.11.012
dc.identifier.issn1017-995X
dc.identifier.quartileQ4
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85042664332
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aott.2017.11.012
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/11206
dc.identifier.wos427173800002
dc.keywordsScheuermann kyphosis
dc.keywordsDistal junctional kyphosis
dc.keywordsSagittal stable vertebra
dc.keywordsFirst lordotic vertebra
dc.keywordsLower end vertebra
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherTurkish Assoc Orthopaedics Traumatology
dc.sourceActa Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica
dc.subjectOrthopedics
dc.titleSelection of distal fusion level in terms of distal junctional kyphosis in Scheuermann kyphosis. A comparison of 3 methods
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.authorid0000-0003-2809-6721
local.contributor.kuauthorKorkmaz, Murat

Files