Publication: Induction or adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer receiving chemoradiotherapy? a Turkish Oncology Group study
Program
KU-Authors
KU Authors
Co-Authors
Sekmek, Serhat
Oguz, Aysel
Karakurt Eryilmaz, Melek
Araz, Murat
Biter, Sedat
Kidi, Mehmet Mutlu
Bayram, Ertugrul
Erdat, Efe Cem
Yasar, Arzu
Colak, Rumeysa
Editor & Affiliation
Compiler & Affiliation
Translator
Other Contributor
Date
Language
Type
Embargo Status
No
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Alternative Title
Abstract
Background/Objectives: In this retrospective study, we aimed to compare the efficacy, survival, and toxicity results of induction (IC) or adjuvant (AC) treatment with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC). Methods: A total of 405 patients from 22 different centres in Turkey, belonging to the Turkish Oncology Group (TOG), was included. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were safety and toxicity. Results: The median age of the patients included in the study was 49 (18.2-91.5) years. In total, 298 (73.6%) of the patients were male. Of the 405 patients, 258 (63.7%) received IC and 147 (36.3%) received AC treatment. When OS and PFS analyses were performed in terms of age, gender, T and N stages, pathological features, and treatments received, no effect of any variable on prognosis was observed. For the overall group, the median estimated OS was 137.3 months (the Kaplan-Meier statistical method could not reach the 95% confidence interval [CI]). For the IC group, the median estimated survival was 137.3 months (95% CI: 111.4-163.3), whereas the Kaplan-Meier statistical method could not estimate survival for the AC group. No statistically significant difference was observed between IC and AC groups in terms of OS (p = 0.209) or PFS (p = 0.248). Grade 3-4 side effects were observed in 12% of patients in the IC group and 29.9% of patients in the AC group. Treatment was discontinued due to toxicity in 5 patients (1.9%) in the IC group and 18 patients (12.2%) in the AC group. Conclusion: No difference in OS or PFS was observed between AC and IC treatments. More grade 3-4 side effects were observed in the AC-treated group and early discontinuation rate was higher.
Source
Publisher
MDPI
Subject
Medicine, General and internal
Citation
Has Part
Source
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Book Series Title
Edition
DOI
10.3390/jcm14124189
item.page.datauri
Link
Rights
CC BY (Attribution)
Copyrights Note
Creative Commons license
Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as CC BY (Attribution)

