Publication:
Dianoia & Plato's divided line

dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Philosophy
dc.contributor.kuauthorStorey, Damien
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteCollege of Social Sciences and Humanities
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T23:39:52Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractThis paper takes a detailed look at the Republic’s Divided Line analogy and considers how we should respond to its most contentious implication: that pistis and dianoia have the same degree of ‘clarity’ (σαφήνεια). It argues that we must take this implication at face value and that doing so allows us to better understand both the analogy and the nature of dianoia.
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.issue3
dc.description.openaccessNO
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.volume67
dc.identifier.doi10.1163/15685284-bja10055
dc.identifier.eissn1568-5284
dc.identifier.issn0031-8868
dc.identifier.quartileQ1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85129335485
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1163/15685284-bja10055
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/13172
dc.identifier.wos852648800001
dc.keywordsPlato
dc.keywordsPlato's epistemology
dc.keywordsRepublic
dc.keywordsDivided line
dc.keywordsDianoia knowledge
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBrill
dc.relation.ispartofPhronesis-A Journal For Ancient Philosophy
dc.subjectPhilosophy
dc.titleDianoia & Plato's divided line
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorStorey, Damien
local.publication.orgunit1College of Social Sciences and Humanities
local.publication.orgunit2Department of Philosophy
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication005b6224-491a-49b4-9afc-a4413d87712b
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery005b6224-491a-49b4-9afc-a4413d87712b
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication3f7621e3-0d26-42c2-af64-58a329522794
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery3f7621e3-0d26-42c2-af64-58a329522794

Files