Publication:
The role of the size and number of index lesion in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with PI-RADS 4 lesions detected by multiparametric MRI of the prostate.

dc.contributor.coauthorKılıç, Mert
dc.contributor.coauthorMadendere, Serdar
dc.contributor.coauthorVural, Metin
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.kuauthorFaculty Member, Balbay, Mevlana Derya
dc.contributor.kuauthorFaculty Member, Esen, Tarık
dc.contributor.kuauthorFaculty Member, Köseoğlu, Ersin
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSCHOOL OF MEDICINE
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-29T09:38:21Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate the contribution of the size and number of the sampled lesions to the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPC) in patients who had PI-RADS 4 lesions. Methods: In this retrospective study, a total of 159 patients who had PI-RADS 4 lesions and underwent In-bore MRI-Guided prostate biopsy were included. Patients with a lesion classified as Grade Group 2 and above were considered to have CSPC. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to evaluate the factors affecting the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) and CSPC. Results: A great majority (86.8%) of the patients were biopsy-naïve. About three-fourths (71.7%) had PCa, and half (54.1%) had CSPC. When the patients were divided into three groups according to the index lesion size (< 5 mm, 5-10 mm, and > 10 mm), the prevalence of PCa was 64.3, 67.5, and 82.4% and the prevalence of CSPC was 42.9, 51.2, and 64.7%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, age, index lesion size, prostate volume (< 50 ml) and being biopsy-naïve were found significant for PCa, while age and prostate volume (< 50 ml) were significant for CSPC. Conclusion: The number of lesions was found to be insignificant in predicting PCa and CSPC. While the size of PI-RADS 4 lesions was significant in predicting PCa, it had no significance in detecting CSPC.
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.issueSupplement 6
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.volume41
dc.identifier.doi10.1200/JCO.2023.41.6_suppl.44
dc.identifier.eissn1527-7755
dc.identifier.issn0732-183X
dc.identifier.quartileQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2023.41.6_suppl.44
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/22667
dc.identifier.wos1098050200132
dc.keywordsBiopsy
dc.keywordsMagnetic resonance imaging
dc.keywordsProstate cancer
dc.keywordsProstate imaging reporting and data system
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Oncology
dc.subjectOncology
dc.titleThe role of the size and number of index lesion in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with PI-RADS 4 lesions detected by multiparametric MRI of the prostate.
dc.typeMeeting Abstract
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorKöseoğlu, Ersin
local.contributor.kuauthorBalbay, Mevlana Derya
local.contributor.kuauthorEsen, Tarık
local.publication.orgunit1SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
local.publication.orgunit2School of Medicine
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e

Files