Publication:
Triplet or doublet therapy in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

dc.contributor.coauthorMandel, Philipp
dc.contributor.coauthorHoeh, Benedikt
dc.contributor.coauthorWenzel, Mike
dc.contributor.coauthorPreisser, Felix
dc.contributor.coauthorTian, Zhe
dc.contributor.coauthorSteuber, Thomas
dc.contributor.coauthorKarakiewicz, Pierre I.
dc.contributor.coauthorChun, Felix K.H.
dc.contributor.kuauthorTilki, Derya
dc.contributor.kuprofileOther
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.yokidN/A
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T23:30:30Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractContext: Two recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reported overall survival benefit of triplet therapy (androgen receptor axis–targeted therapy agent [ARAT], docetaxel, and androgen deprivation therapy [ADT]) over that of doublet therapy (docetaxel and ADT) in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Ranking of therapy options and comparisons between triplet therapy and doublet ARAT and ADT therapy are scarce. Objective: To rank therapy options (triplet vs doublet [docetaxel and ADT] vs doublet [ARAT and ADT]) and address them within formal network meta-analyses (NMAs); subsequently, NMAs were refitted following stratification according to (1) low- and high-volume tumor burden and (2) doublet versus triplet therapy. Evidence acquisition: A systematic literature review (PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane database) of RCT trials that investigated the overall survival efficacy of systemic treatment in the setting of mHSPC was conducted. The study search and inclusion criteria were in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Evidence synthesis: Ten RCTs (n = 9702) were identified. The NMA focusing on the overall cohort of mHSPC demonstrated that triplet therapies (darolutamide, docetaxel, and ADT, and abiraterone, docetaxel, and ADT) were ranked first and second (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44–0.66; HR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.46–0.78), followed by doublet therapy (ARAT and ADT) and lastly docetaxel and ADT. Owing to missing data within one RCT, the NMA for low- and high-volume mHSPC focused on nine trials. In high-volume disease, triplet therapy (abiraterone, docetaxel, and ADT) was ranked first (HR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.38–0.71). Conclusions: Triplet therapy, consisting of an ARAT, docetaxel, and ADT, ranked first in systematic treatment in mHSPC. Moreover, triplet therapy might result in more pronounced overall survival benefit than doublet ARAT and ADT therapy in high-volume mHSPC. Patient summary: We compared different systemic therapy options for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and concluded that triplet therapy, consisting of androgen receptor axis–targeted therapy agent, docetaxel, and androgen deprivation therapy, seems to be most beneficial for overall survival.
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.openaccessYES
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.volume9
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.euf.2022.08.007
dc.identifier.issn2405-4569
dc.identifier.linkhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85138544821&doi=10.1016%2fj.euf.2022.08.007&partnerID=40&md5=3d3c20af858b70493678beb5c3f45296
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85138544821
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2022.08.007
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/12250
dc.identifier.wos992306800001
dc.keywordsAbiraterone
dc.keywordsApalutamide
dc.keywordsARASENS
dc.keywordsDarolutamide
dc.keywordsDoublet therapy
dc.keywordsEnzalutamide
dc.keywordsHormone sensitive
dc.keywordsMetastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer
dc.keywordsMetastatic prostate cancer
dc.keywordsPEACE-1
dc.keywordsTriplet therapy Androgen Antagonists
dc.keywordsAndrogens
dc.keywordsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
dc.keywordsDocetaxel
dc.keywordsHumans
dc.keywordsMale
dc.keywordsNetwork Meta-Analysis
dc.keywordsProstatic Neoplasms
dc.keywordsReceptors, Androgen
dc.keywordsTreatment Outcome
dc.keywordsAbiraterone
dc.keywordsApalutamide
dc.keywordsDarolutamide
dc.keywordsDocetaxel
dc.keywordsEnzalutamide
dc.keywordsAndrogen
dc.keywordsAndrogen receptor
dc.keywordsAntiandrogen
dc.keywordsAntineoplastic agent
dc.keywordsDocetaxel
dc.keywordsAndrogen deprivation therapy
dc.keywordsCancer patient
dc.keywordsCancer therapy
dc.keywordsConfidence interval
dc.keywordsDrug efficacy
dc.keywordsFollow up
dc.keywordsHazard ratio
dc.keywordsHuman
dc.keywordsMeta analysis
dc.keywordsMetastatic castration sensitive prostate cancer
dc.keywordsOverall survival
dc.keywordsReview
dc.keywordsSystematic review
dc.keywordsTreatment outcome
dc.keywordsTumor volume
dc.keywordsMale
dc.keywordsNetwork meta-analysis
dc.keywordsPathology
dc.keywordsProstate tumor
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.sourceEuropean Urology Focus
dc.subjectUrology
dc.subjectNephrology
dc.titleTriplet or doublet therapy in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
dc.typeReview
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.authorid0000-0001-7033-1380
local.contributor.kuauthorTilki, Derya

Files