Publication:
Minimizing thickness variation in the vacuum infusion (VI) process

dc.contributor.departmentN/A
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Mechanical Engineering
dc.contributor.departmentN/A
dc.contributor.departmentN/A
dc.contributor.kuauthorYenilmez, Bekir
dc.contributor.kuauthorSözer, Murat
dc.contributor.kuauthorAkyol, Talha
dc.contributor.kuauthorÇağlar, Barış
dc.contributor.kuprofilePhD Student
dc.contributor.kuprofileFaculty Member
dc.contributor.kuprofileMaster Student
dc.contributor.kuprofilePhD Student
dc.contributor.otherDepartment of Mechanical Engineering
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteGraduate School of Sciences and Engineering
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteCollege of Engineering
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteGraduate School of Sciences and Engineering
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteGraduate School of Sciences and Engineering
dc.contributor.yokidN/A
dc.contributor.yokid110357
dc.contributor.yokidN/A
dc.contributor.yokidN/A
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T23:46:07Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.description.abstractIn the Vacuum Infusion (VI) process, the thickness of a composite part changes as the compaction pressure on the vacuum bag and reinforcing fibre preform changes. Pressure and thickness were monitored along a 1D resin fl ow using pressure transducers and non-contact laser displacement sensors. To decrease the thickness variation, control actions were taken by adjusting the injection conditions, such as opening/closing gates/vents, changing pressure of them in the post-mold filling stage and bleeding out the excess resin. The control actions were taken based on an available compaction/decompaction database for the fabric type used. Compared to the case study with no control action other than bleeding, a better job was done in the controlled case study by decreasing the maximum thickness variation from 5.44% to 0.39%. A coupled fl ow and compaction model qualitatively verified the pressure and thickness distributions for both filling and post-filling stages.
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.issue6
dc.description.openaccessYES
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.volume20
dc.identifier.doiN/A
dc.identifier.issn0963-6935
dc.identifier.linkhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84862064768andpartnerID=40andmd5=e7b131bf79cbacab210d4006d502b242
dc.identifier.quartileQ3
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84862064768
dc.identifier.uriN/A
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/13922
dc.keywordsFabrics
dc.keywordsProcess monitoring
dc.keywordsResin flow
dc.keywordsThickness variation fabrics
dc.keywordsFilling
dc.keywordsMolds
dc.keywordsProcess monitoring
dc.keywordsResins
dc.keywordsCompaction pressure
dc.keywordsControlled case study
dc.keywordsInjection conditions
dc.keywordsLaser displacement sensors
dc.keywordsReinforcing fibres
dc.keywordsResin flows
dc.keywordsThickness distributions
dc.keywordsThickness variation
dc.keywordsCompaction
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherAdcotec Ltd.
dc.sourceAdvanced Composites Letters
dc.subjectMechanical Engineering
dc.titleMinimizing thickness variation in the vacuum infusion (VI) process
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.authorid0000-0002-8614-347X
local.contributor.authorid0000-0001-7327-5628
local.contributor.authoridN/A
local.contributor.authorid0000-0001-7771-7323
local.contributor.kuauthorYenilmez, Bekir
local.contributor.kuauthorSözer, Murat
local.contributor.kuauthorAkyol, Talha
local.contributor.kuauthorÇağlar, Barış
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationba2836f3-206d-4724-918c-f598f0086a36
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryba2836f3-206d-4724-918c-f598f0086a36

Files