Publication:
Machine learning-enabled optimization of extrusion-based 3D printing

dc.contributor.departmentN/A
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Media and Visual Arts
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Mechanical Engineering
dc.contributor.kuauthorDabbagh, Sajjad Rahmani
dc.contributor.kuauthorÖzcan, Oğuzhan
dc.contributor.kuauthorTaşoğlu, Savaş
dc.contributor.kuprofilePhD Stud
dc.contributor.kuprofileent
dc.contributor.kuprofileFaculty Member
dc.contributor.kuprofileFaculty Member
dc.contributor.otherDepartment of Media and Visual Arts
dc.contributor.otherDepartment of Mechanical Engineering
dc.contributor.researchcenterResearch Center for Creative Industries (KUAR) / KU Arçelik Yaratıcı Endüstriler Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi (KUAR)
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteGraduate School of Sciences and Engineering
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteCollege of Social Sciences and Humanities
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteCollege of Engineering
dc.contributor.yokidN/A
dc.contributor.yokid12532
dc.contributor.yokid291971
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T23:11:13Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractMachine learning (ML) and three-dimensional (3D) printing are among the fastest-growing branches of science. While ML can enable computers to independently learn from available data to make decisions with minimal human intervention, 3D printing has opened up an avenue for modern, multi-material, manufacture of complex 3D structures with a rapid turn-around ability for users with limited manufacturing experience. However, the determination of optimum printing parameters is still a challenge, increasing pre-printing process time and material wastage. Here, we present the first integration of ML and 3D printing through an easy-to-use graphical user interface (GUI) for printing parameter optimization. Unlike the widely held orthogonal design used in most of the 3D printing research, we, for the first time, used nine different computer-aided design (CAD) images and in order to enable ML algorithms to distinguish the difference between designs, we devised a self-designed method to calculate the "complexity index" of CAD designs. In addition, for the first time, the similarity of the print outcomes and CAD images are measured using four different self-designed labeling methods (both manually and automatically) to figure out the best labeling method for ML purposes. Subsequently, we trained eight ML algorithms on 224 datapoints to identify the best ML model for 3D printing applications. The "gradient boosting regression" model yields the best prediction performance with an R-2 score of 0.954. The ML-embedded GUI developed in this study enables users (either skilled or unskilled in 3D printing and/or ML) to simply upload a design (desired to print) to the GUI along with desired printing temperature and pressure to obtain the approximate similarity in the case of actual 3D printing of the uploaded design. This ultimately can prevent error-and-trial steps prior to printing which in return can speed up overall design-to-end-product time with less material waste and more cost-efficiency.
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.openaccessNO
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuTÜBİTAK
dc.description.sponsorshipTubitak 2232 International Fellowship [118C391]
dc.description.sponsorshipAlexander von Humboldt Research Fellowship [101003361]
dc.description.sponsorshipRoyal Academy Newton- Katip Celebi Transforming Systems Through Partnership award [120 N019] S.T. acknowledges the Tubitak 2232 International Fellowship for the Outstanding Researchers Award (118C391), Alexander von Humboldt Research Fellowship for Experienced Researchers, Marie Sklodowska- Curie Individual Fellowship (101003361), and Royal Academy Newton- Katip Celebi Transforming Systems Through Partnership award (120 N019) for financial support of this research. Opinions, interpretations, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by the TUEB ?ITAK. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed. Some elements in Fig. 1 have been designed using resources from Flaticon. com.
dc.description.volume206
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ymeth.2022.08.002
dc.identifier.eissn1095-9130
dc.identifier.issn1046-2023
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85135912361
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2022.08.002
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/9599
dc.identifier.wos860422900004
dc.keywordsArtificial intelligence
dc.keywordsMachine learning
dc.keywords3D printing
dc.keywordsImage analysis
dc.keywordsGraphical user interface
dc.keywordsOptimization
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherAcademic Press Inc Elsevier Science
dc.sourceMethods
dc.subjectBiochemical research methods
dc.subjectBiochemistry
dc.subjectMolecular biology
dc.titleMachine learning-enabled optimization of extrusion-based 3D printing
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.authorid0000-0001-8888-6106
local.contributor.authorid0000-0002-4410-3955
local.contributor.authorid0000-0003-4604-217X
local.contributor.kuauthorDabbagh, Sajjad Rahmani
local.contributor.kuauthorÖzcan, Oğuzhan
local.contributor.kuauthorTaşoğlu, Savaş
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication483fa792-2b89-4020-9073-eb4f497ee3fd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationba2836f3-206d-4724-918c-f598f0086a36
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery483fa792-2b89-4020-9073-eb4f497ee3fd

Files