Publication:
Real-world treatment patterns and survival in uveal melanoma: a multicenter cohort study by the Turkish Oncology Group (TOG)

dc.contributor.coauthorOn, Sercan
dc.contributor.coauthorCebeci, Selin
dc.contributor.coauthorTurna, Zeynep Hande
dc.contributor.coauthorGuc Sevgen, Zeynep Gulsum
dc.contributor.coauthorGuven, Deniz Can
dc.contributor.coauthorKilickap, Sadettin
dc.contributor.coauthorBaser, Mehmet Nuri
dc.contributor.coauthorDemir, Bilgin
dc.contributor.coauthorBiter, Sedat
dc.contributor.coauthorBayram, Ertugrul
dc.contributor.coauthorYesilyurt, Berkay
dc.contributor.coauthorUncu, Dogan
dc.contributor.coauthorArslan, Ahmet Melih
dc.contributor.coauthorAtag Akyurek, Elif
dc.contributor.coauthorArvas, Hayati
dc.contributor.coauthorUrakci, Zuhat
dc.contributor.coauthorSakalar, Teoman
dc.contributor.coauthorAslan, Ferit
dc.contributor.coauthorUzun, Mehmet
dc.contributor.coauthorYildirim, Mustafa
dc.contributor.coauthorUnlu, Ahmet
dc.contributor.coauthorKivrak Salim, Derya
dc.contributor.coauthorErdogan, Atike Pinar
dc.contributor.coauthorSahin, Elif
dc.contributor.coauthorGunduz, Seyda
dc.contributor.coauthorGulbagci, Burcu
dc.contributor.coauthorKaraca Yayla, Saziye Burcak
dc.contributor.coauthorCakar, Burcu
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.kuauthorGündüz, Şeyda
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSCHOOL OF MEDICINE
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-02T07:04:19Z
dc.date.available2026-03-27
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractBackground/Objectives: Uveal melanoma (UM) is a subtype of melanoma that originates from the uveal layer of the eye (iris, ciliary body, choroid) and is biologically distinct from cutaneous melanoma. The real-world evidence on treatment patterns and survival outcomes, particularly from non-Western populations, remains limited. This study provides a comprehensive national overview of local and systemic management of UM across T & uuml;rkiye. Methods: This multicenter retrospective cohort study, coordinated by the Turkish Oncology Group (TOG), included patients diagnosed with UM between 2012 and 2025 across 19 tertiary oncology centers. Clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes were analyzed. Systemic therapies were subgrouped as immunotherapy or cytotoxic chemotherapy. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method; prognostic factors for OS were analyzed by Cox regression. Results: A total of 113 patients were included; 89.4% presented with localized disease. During follow-up, 43.4% developed metastases, predominantly hepatic (93.5%). 47.4% of metastatic patients received liver-directed treatments; the most common treatment was radioembolization, and these treatments were associated with longer OS. Among 59 patients receiving systemic therapy, immunotherapy demonstrated higher ORR and DCR than chemotherapy across treatment lines, although small subgroup sizes limited statistical significance. Dual immune checkpoint blockade emerged as an independent favorable prognostic factor in multivariate analysis. Median OS for metastatic patients was 16 months (95% CI: 9.3-22.7). HLA-A*02:01 was positive in 29.4% of patients tested, and only three patients received tebentafusp. Conclusions: This large national cohort highlights substantial real-world heterogeneity in treatment patterns and confirms the limited efficacy of chemotherapy, the prognostic benefit of dual ICI therapy, and the potential survival advantage of liver-directed treatments in selected patients. Low HLA-A*02:01 positivity and limited access to tebentafusp remain major challenges in T & uuml;rkiye. These findings provide an essential benchmark for improving treatment strategies in metastatic UM.
dc.description.fulltextNo
dc.description.harvestedfromManual
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.openaccessGreen Submitted, gold
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.readpublishN/A
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.versionPublished Version
dc.identifier.WoSQuartileQ2
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/cancers18030394
dc.identifier.eissn2072-6694
dc.identifier.embargoNo
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.pubmed41681877
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105030029452
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers18030394
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/32886
dc.identifier.volume18
dc.identifier.wos1687662600001
dc.keywordsMelanoma
dc.keywordsUveal
dc.keywordsCiliary body melanoma
dc.keywordsNivolumab
dc.keywordsIpilimumab
dc.keywordsTebentafusp
dc.keywordsLocal therapies
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.relation.affiliationKoç University
dc.relation.collectionKoç University Institutional Repository
dc.relation.ispartofCancers
dc.relation.openaccessN/A
dc.rightsN/A
dc.rights.uriN/A
dc.subjectOncology
dc.titleReal-world treatment patterns and survival in uveal melanoma: a multicenter cohort study by the Turkish Oncology Group (TOG)
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e

Files