Publication:
Triplet or doublet therapy in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Placeholder

Departments

School / College / Institute

Organizational Unit
Organizational Unit
SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
Upper Org Unit

Program

KU-Authors

KU Authors

Co-Authors

Mandel, Philipp
Hoeh, Benedikt
Wenzel, Mike
Preisser, Felix
Tian, Zhe
Steuber, Thomas
Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
Chun, Felix K. H.

Publication Date

Language

Type

Embargo Status

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Alternative Title

Abstract

Context: Two recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reported overall survival ben-efit of triplet therapy (androgen receptor axis-targeted therapy agent [ARAT], docetaxel, and androgen deprivation therapy [ADT]) over that of doublet therapy (docetaxel and ADT) in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Ranking of therapy options and comparisons between triplet therapy and doublet ARAT and ADT therapy are scarce.Objective: To rank therapy options (triplet vs doublet [docetaxel and ADT] vs doublet [ARAT and ADT]) and address them within formal network meta-analyses (NMAs); subsequently, NMAs were refitted following stratification according to (1) low-and high-volume tumor burden and (2) doublet versus triplet therapy.Evidence acquisition: A systematic literature review (PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane database) of RCT trials that investigated the overall survival efficacy of systemic treatment in the setting of mHSPC was conducted. The study search and inclusion criteria were in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines.Evidence synthesis: Ten RCTs (n = 9702) were identified. The NMA focusing on the over-all cohort of mHSPC demonstrated that triplet therapies (darolutamide, docetaxel, and ADT, and abiraterone, docetaxel, and ADT) were ranked first and second (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44-0.66; HR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.46-0.78), fol-lowed by doublet therapy (ARAT and ADT) and lastly docetaxel and ADT. Owing to miss-ing data within one RCT, the NMA for low-and high-volume mHSPC focused on nine trials. In high-volume disease, triplet therapy (abiraterone, docetaxel, and ADT) was ranked first (HR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.38-0.71).Conclusions: Triplet therapy, consisting of an ARAT, docetaxel, and ADT, ranked first in systematic treatment in mHSPC. Moreover, triplet therapy might result in more pro-nounced overall survival benefit than doublet ARAT and ADT therapy in high-volume mHSPC.

Source

Publisher

Elsevier

Subject

Urology, Nephrology

Citation

Has Part

Source

European Urology Focus

Book Series Title

Edition

DOI

10.1016/j.euf.2022.08.007

item.page.datauri

Link

Rights

Copyrights Note

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

0

Views

0

Downloads

View PlumX Details