Publication: Why do comparative public policy and political economy scholars need an analytic eclectic view of structure, institution and agency?
dc.contributor.department | Department of International Relations | |
dc.contributor.kuauthor | Bakır, Caner | |
dc.contributor.kuprofile | Faculty Member | |
dc.contributor.other | Department of International Relations | |
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstitute | College of Administrative Sciences and Economics | |
dc.contributor.yokid | 108141 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-11-09T23:26:52Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.description.abstract | This article illustrates an analytic eclectic value of structure, institution and agency (SIa) framework in comparative public policy. It engages and utilizes certain structural, institutional and agential perspectives from past literature to specify how elements of their causal properties coexist as part of a more complex argument. It argues that desired or preferred policy and/or institutional outcomes are most likely when multiple structural and institutional complementarities (from structures and institutions to agents) and multiple structural, institutional and agential enabling conditions accompany one another in motivating and empowering actors (from agents to structures and institutions) to engage in purposeful agential actions. | |
dc.description.indexedby | WoS | |
dc.description.indexedby | Scopus | |
dc.description.issue | 5 | |
dc.description.openaccess | NO | |
dc.description.publisherscope | International | |
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEu | TÜBİTAK | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey [1059B192001130] This research was supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey grant (TUBITAK2219, Project No. 1059B192001130). | |
dc.description.volume | 24 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/13876988.2021.1919515 | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1572-5448 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1387-6988 | |
dc.identifier.quartile | Q2 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85137979117 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2021.1919515 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/11619 | |
dc.identifier.wos | 854258300002 | |
dc.keywords | Comparative | |
dc.keywords | public policy | |
dc.keywords | Structure | |
dc.keywords | institution | |
dc.keywords | Agency | |
dc.keywords | Policy entrepreneur | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.publisher | Taylor and Francis Ltd | |
dc.source | Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis | |
dc.subject | Public administration | |
dc.title | Why do comparative public policy and political economy scholars need an analytic eclectic view of structure, institution and agency? | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
local.contributor.authorid | 0000-0001-8166-4623 | |
local.contributor.kuauthor | Bakır, Caner | |
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | 9fc25a77-75a8-48c0-8878-02d9b71a9126 | |
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 9fc25a77-75a8-48c0-8878-02d9b71a9126 |