Publication:
Prognostic significance of 18F-FDG PET/CT indices in metastatic renal cell cancer and evaluation of revised imdc risk model by including 18F-FDG PET-CT parameters

Placeholder

Organizational Units

Program

KU Authors

Co-Authors

Arikan, Rukiye
Ozguven, Salih
Telli, Tugba Akin
Isik, Selver
Demircan, Nazim Can
Basoglu, Tugba
Yasar, Alper
Celebi, Abdussamet
Filizoglu, Nuh
Ustun, Hilal Sagiroglu

Advisor

Publication Date

Language

English

Type

Journal Article

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Abstract

Background: Prognostic markers in metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) are still insufficient. Any prognostic model objectively determines disease burden. Purpose: To investigate the relationship between 18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) parameters and outcomes in mRCC, and to define a revised International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) model for the intermediate-risk group. Material and Methods: A retrospective study of mRCC was conducted. To investigate the prognostic significance of 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters, maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) were determined in pre-treatment images. Cutoff values were defined by ROC curve analyses and their association with outcomes was analyzed. Additionally, a TLG-adjusted IMDC model was created by stratifying intermediate-risk group patients according to TLG levels. Results: The study included 52 patients. The disease control rate (DCR) was 61.5% and median overall survival (OS) was 18 months (95% confidence interval=9.2ā€“25.8). In the univariate analyses, IMDC score, MTV, and TLG were prognostic factors for Disease Control Rate (DCR), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG)-Performance Status (PS), IMDC score, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), treatment option, MTV, and TLG were prognostic factors for OS (Pā€‰<ā€‰0.05 each). In the multivariate analyses, MTV was an independent prognostic factor for DCR, and ECOG-PS, LDH, IMDC score, and TLG were independent prognostic factors for OS. According to the revised-IMDC model, the intermediate-favorable group showed longer OS than the intermediate-unfavorable group. Conclusion: Pretreatment MTV was independent prognostic factor for DCR and ECOG-PS, LDH, IMDC score, and TLG were independent prognostic factors for OS. Revised-IMDC model could identify patients with a worse prognosis among the IMDC intermediate-risk group.

Description

Source:

Acta Radiologica

Publisher:

Sage Publications Ltd

Keywords:

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear medicine, Imaging systems in medicine

Citation

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Copy Rights Note

0

Views

0

Downloads

View PlumX Details