Publication: Real-world treatment patterns and survival in uveal melanoma: a multicenter cohort study by the Turkish Oncology Group (TOG)
Program
KU-Authors
KU Authors
Co-Authors
Sercan On
Selin Cebeci
Zeynep Hande Turna
Zeynep Gülsüm Güç Sevgen
Deniz Can Guven
Sadettin Kılıçkap
Mehmet Nuri Başer
Bilgin Demir
Sedat Biter
Ertuğrul Bayram
Editor & Affiliation
Compiler & Affiliation
Translator
Other Contributor
Date
Language
Type
Embargo Status
No
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Alternative Title
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Uveal melanoma (UM) is a subtype of melanoma that originates from the uveal layer of the eye (iris, ciliary body, choroid) and is biologically distinct from cutaneous melanoma. The real-world evidence on treatment patterns and survival outcomes, particularly from non-Western populations, remains limited. This study provides a comprehensive national overview of local and systemic management of UM across Türkiye. Methods: This multicenter retrospective cohort study, coordinated by the Turkish Oncology Group (TOG), included patients diagnosed with UM between 2012 and 2025 across 19 tertiary oncology centers. Clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes were analyzed. Systemic therapies were subgrouped as immunotherapy or cytotoxic chemotherapy. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed by the Kaplan–Meier method; prognostic factors for OS were analyzed by Cox regression. Results: A total of 113 patients were included; 89.4% presented with localized disease. During follow-up, 43.4% developed metastases, predominantly hepatic (93.5%). 47.4% of metastatic patients received liver-directed treatments; the most common treatment was radioembolization, and these treatments were associated with longer OS. Among 59 patients receiving systemic therapy, immunotherapy demonstrated higher ORR and DCR than chemotherapy across treatment lines, although small subgroup sizes limited statistical significance. Dual immune checkpoint blockade emerged as an independent favorable prognostic factor in multivariate analysis. Median OS for metastatic patients was 16 months (95% CI: 9.3–22.7). HLA-A*02:01 was positive in 29.4% of patients tested, and only three patients received tebentafusp. Conclusions: This large national cohort highlights substantial real-world heterogeneity in treatment patterns and confirms the limited efficacy of chemotherapy, the prognostic benefit of dual ICI therapy, and the potential survival advantage of liver-directed treatments in selected patients. Low HLA-A*02:01 positivity and limited access to tebentafusp remain major challenges in Türkiye. These findings provide an essential benchmark for improving treatment strategies in metastatic UM.</jats:p>
Source
Publisher
MDPI
Subject
Oncology
Citation
Has Part
Source
Cancers
Book Series Title
Edition
DOI
10.3390/cancers18030394
item.page.datauri
Link
Rights
CC BY (Attribution)
Copyrights Note
Creative Commons license
Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as CC BY (Attribution)

