Publication:
Real-world treatment patterns and survival in uveal melanoma: a multicenter cohort study by the Turkish Oncology Group (TOG)

dc.contributor.coauthorSercan On
dc.contributor.coauthorSelin Cebeci
dc.contributor.coauthorZeynep Hande Turna
dc.contributor.coauthorZeynep Gülsüm Güç Sevgen
dc.contributor.coauthorDeniz Can Guven
dc.contributor.coauthorSadettin Kılıçkap
dc.contributor.coauthorMehmet Nuri Başer
dc.contributor.coauthorBilgin Demir
dc.contributor.coauthorSedat Biter
dc.contributor.coauthorErtuğrul Bayram
dc.contributor.coauthorBerkay Yeşilyurt
dc.contributor.coauthorDoğan Uncu
dc.contributor.coauthorAhmet Melih Arslan
dc.contributor.coauthorElif Atağ Akyürek
dc.contributor.coauthorHayati Arvas
dc.contributor.coauthorZuhat Urakçı
dc.contributor.coauthorTeoman Şakalar
dc.contributor.coauthorFerit Aslan
dc.contributor.coauthorMehmet Uzun
dc.contributor.coauthorMustafa Yıldırım
dc.contributor.coauthorAhmet Unlu
dc.contributor.coauthorDerya Kıvrak Salim
dc.contributor.coauthorAtike Pınar Erdoğan
dc.contributor.coauthorElif Sahin
dc.contributor.coauthorBurcu Gülbağcı
dc.contributor.coauthorŞaziye Burçak Karaca Yayla
dc.contributor.coauthorBurcu Cakar
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.facultymemberNo
dc.contributor.kuauthorGündüz, Şeyda
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteKUH (KOÇ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL)
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-16T06:24:08Z
dc.date.available2026-01-27
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractBackground/Objectives: Uveal melanoma (UM) is a subtype of melanoma that originates from the uveal layer of the eye (iris, ciliary body, choroid) and is biologically distinct from cutaneous melanoma. The real-world evidence on treatment patterns and survival outcomes, particularly from non-Western populations, remains limited. This study provides a comprehensive national overview of local and systemic management of UM across Türkiye. Methods: This multicenter retrospective cohort study, coordinated by the Turkish Oncology Group (TOG), included patients diagnosed with UM between 2012 and 2025 across 19 tertiary oncology centers. Clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes were analyzed. Systemic therapies were subgrouped as immunotherapy or cytotoxic chemotherapy. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed by the Kaplan–Meier method; prognostic factors for OS were analyzed by Cox regression. Results: A total of 113 patients were included; 89.4% presented with localized disease. During follow-up, 43.4% developed metastases, predominantly hepatic (93.5%). 47.4% of metastatic patients received liver-directed treatments; the most common treatment was radioembolization, and these treatments were associated with longer OS. Among 59 patients receiving systemic therapy, immunotherapy demonstrated higher ORR and DCR than chemotherapy across treatment lines, although small subgroup sizes limited statistical significance. Dual immune checkpoint blockade emerged as an independent favorable prognostic factor in multivariate analysis. Median OS for metastatic patients was 16 months (95% CI: 9.3–22.7). HLA-A*02:01 was positive in 29.4% of patients tested, and only three patients received tebentafusp. Conclusions: This large national cohort highlights substantial real-world heterogeneity in treatment patterns and confirms the limited efficacy of chemotherapy, the prognostic benefit of dual ICI therapy, and the potential survival advantage of liver-directed treatments in selected patients. Low HLA-A*02:01 positivity and limited access to tebentafusp remain major challenges in Türkiye. These findings provide an essential benchmark for improving treatment strategies in metastatic UM.</jats:p>
dc.description.fulltextYes
dc.description.harvestedfromOpenAire API
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.openaccessGold OA
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.studentonlypublicationNo
dc.description.studentpublicationNo
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/cancers18030394
dc.identifier.eissn2072-6694
dc.identifier.embargoNo
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.openairedoi_dedup___::31aefc32584bc82f26fd2557835d2298
dc.identifier.pubmed41681877
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105030029452
dc.identifier.startpage394
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/32572
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18030394
dc.identifier.volume18
dc.identifier.wos001687662600001
dc.keywordsCiliary body melanoma
dc.keywordsIpilimumab
dc.keywordsLocal therapies
dc.keywordsMelanoma
dc.keywordsNivolumab
dc.keywordsTebentafusp
dc.keywordsUveal
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.relation.affiliationKoç University
dc.relation.collectionKoç University Institutional Repository
dc.relation.ispartofCancers
dc.relation.openaccessYes
dc.rightsCC BY (Attribution)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectOncology
dc.titleReal-world treatment patterns and survival in uveal melanoma: a multicenter cohort study by the Turkish Oncology Group (TOG)
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication055775c9-9efe-43ec-814f-f6d771fa6dee
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery055775c9-9efe-43ec-814f-f6d771fa6dee

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
IR06889.pdf
Size:
646.72 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format