Publication:
The effect of electrical bone stimulation on bone union in foot and ankle injuries: a scoping review

dc.contributor.coauthorSchluter, Raia
dc.contributor.coauthorMcLeod, Hannah
dc.contributor.coauthorEbrahimi, Alireza
dc.contributor.coauthorSubasi, Omer
dc.contributor.coauthorAslan, Lercan
dc.contributor.coauthorAshkani-Esfahani, Soheil
dc.contributor.coauthorKwon, John Y.
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.kuauthorGedik, Cemil Cihad
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSCHOOL OF MEDICINE
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-02T07:04:37Z
dc.date.available2026-03-27
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study aimed to evaluate the reported efficacy of electrical bone stimulation (EBS) in promoting union in foot and ankle fractures and arthrodesis by synthesizing the available literature. Methods: A literature review was conducted using PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and CINAHL. Study type, patient demographics, interventions, and outcomes were extracted. The Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies assessment tool was used for methodological quality assessment and for evaluating outcomes regarding union rates. Results: Fourteen studies involving 1253 patients met inclusion criteria from a total of 668 screened articles. These studies involved 1253 patients treated with EBS for foot and ankle fracture and fusion surgeries. The majority of investigations reported increased success unionization and reduced time to union using EBS methods including direct current, capacitated coupling, pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF), low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS), and combined magnetic field. Conclusion: Although existing evidence suggests that EBS may enhance union rates, there is no consensus regarding the most effective stimulation modality due to limited comparative data. Emerging modalities such as PEMF and LIPUS demonstrate promising results; however, well-designed comparative studies are needed to clarify their relative efficacy and safety profiles.
dc.description.fulltextNo
dc.description.harvestedfromManual
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.openaccessGreen Submitted, gold
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.readpublishN/A
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.versionPublished Version
dc.identifier.WoSQuartileQ3
dc.identifier.doi10.5152/j.aott.2025.25756
dc.identifier.eissn2589-1294
dc.identifier.embargoNo
dc.identifier.issn1017-995X
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.pubmed41578809
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105027868579
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org10.1016/j.pedn.2026.02.020
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/32912
dc.identifier.volume59
dc.identifier.wos001686145200004
dc.keywordsArthrodesis
dc.keywordsDelayed union
dc.keywordsNonunion
dc.keywordsPseudarthrosis
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherTurkish Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology
dc.relation.affiliationKoç University
dc.relation.collectionKoç University Institutional Repository
dc.relation.ispartofActa Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica
dc.relation.openaccessN/A
dc.rightsN/A
dc.rights.uriN/A
dc.subjectOrthopedics
dc.titleThe effect of electrical bone stimulation on bone union in foot and ankle injuries: a scoping review
dc.typeReview
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e

Files