Publication:
Copy funding sources: this study was supported by Lumisque, inc. The funder was not involved in the study and manuscript preparation

dc.contributor.coauthorHernandez-Rovira, B.
dc.contributor.coauthorVillamaria, E.
dc.contributor.coauthorPurushothaman, K. R.
dc.contributor.coauthorZiebart, R.
dc.contributor.coauthorShamban, A.
dc.contributor.coauthorWyles, S.
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.kuauthorÖzarslan, Bengisu
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSCHOOL OF MEDICINE
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-15T10:54:19Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractTopical carboxytherapy, a transcutaneous carbon dioxide (CO2) delivery system, may support skin repair and regeneration, yet its role as an adjunct to fractional laser treatment remains underexplored. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness and safety of topical CO2 mask (CO2Lift® Carboxy Gel, Lumisque Skincare) in supporting skin recovery and improving clinical outcomes following fractional CO2 laser resurfacing. METHOD: This 12-week randomized, placebo-controlled trial evaluated mild-to-moderate photoaging (n=6 females only). Participants received either topical carboxytherapy (n=4) or standard care (n=2). Assessments included VISIA-CR imaging, biophysical measurements, investigator ratings, and paired (baseline and 4-week) skin biopsies. RESULTS: Topical carboxytherapy accelerated recovery and was well-tolerated, with no major adverse events. VISIA-CR imaging showed accelerated erythema resolution, transepidermal water loss normalized more rapidly, and pH remained stable. Skin histology at week 4 revealed epidermal thickening and rete ridge formation with topical carboxytherapy vs placebo. Investigator ratings demonstrated significantly improved healing, global assessment, and global aesthetic improvement scale scores, with trends toward improvement in photodamage, rhytides, and pigmentation. CONCLUSION: Adjunctive topical carboxytherapy after fractional CO2 resurfacing accelerated healing, improved barrier recovery, and overall aesthetic outcomes. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.
dc.description.harvestedfromManual
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.sponsorshipN/A
dc.description.versionPublished Version
dc.identifier.ScopusPercentile53
dc.identifier.ScopusQuartileQ2
dc.identifier.WoSPercentile50.0
dc.identifier.WoSQuartileQ3
dc.identifier.doi10.36849/jdd.9635
dc.identifier.endpage846
dc.identifier.grantnoN/A
dc.identifier.issn1545-9616
dc.identifier.issue9
dc.identifier.pubmed42696341
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105049290097
dc.identifier.startpage839
dc.identifier.urihttp://doi.org/10.36849/jdd.9635
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/35333
dc.identifier.volume25
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherSanovaWorks
dc.relation.affiliationKoç University
dc.relation.collectionKoç University Institutional Repository
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Drugs in Dermatology
dc.relation.openaccessN/A
dc.subjectHealth sciences
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.subjectDermatology
dc.subjectSurgery
dc.subjectUrology
dc.titleCopy funding sources: this study was supported by Lumisque, inc. The funder was not involved in the study and manuscript preparation
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e

Files