Publication:
Posterior transpedicular dynamic stabilization versus total disc replacement in the treatment of lumbar painful degenerative disc disease: a comparison of clinical results

dc.contributor.coauthorOktenoglu, Tunc
dc.contributor.coauthorSasani, Mehdi
dc.contributor.coauthorAtaker, Yaprak
dc.contributor.coauthorGomleksiz, Cengiz
dc.contributor.coauthorCelebi, Irfan
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.kuauthorÖzer, Ali Fahir
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSCHOOL OF MEDICINE
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T23:53:41Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.description.abstractStudy Design. Prospective clinical study. Objective.. is study compares the clinical results of anterior lumbar total disc replacement and posterior transpedicular dynamic stabilization in the treatment of degenerative disc disease. Summary and Background Data. Over the last two decades, both techniques have emerged as alternative treatment options to fusion surgery. Methods.. is study was conducted between 2004 and 2010 with a total of 50 patients (25 in each group). The mean age of the patients in total disc prosthesis group was 37,32 years. The mean age of the patients in posterior dynamic transpedicular stabilization was 43,08. Clinical (VAS and Oswestry) and radiological evaluations (lumbar lordosis and segmental lordosis angles) of the patients were carried out prior to the operation and 3, 12, and 24 months a. er the operation. We compared the average duration of surgery, blood loss during the surgery and the length of hospital stay of both groups. Results. Both techniques offered significant improvements in clinical parameters. There was no significant change in radiologic evaluations after the surgery for both techniques. Conclusion. Both dynamic systems provided spine stability. However, the posterior dynamic system had a slight advantage over anterior disc prosthesis because of its convenient application and fewer possible complications.
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.openaccessYES
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.volume2013
dc.identifier.doi10.1155/2013/874090
dc.identifier.eissn2090-3472
dc.identifier.issn2090-3464
dc.identifier.quartileN/A
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1155/2013/874090
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/15067
dc.identifier.wos215170200028
dc.keywordsInvestigational device exemption
dc.keywordsCharite(Tm) artificial disc
dc.keywordsFollow-up
dc.keywordsSurgical technique
dc.keywordsSpinal stenosis
dc.keywordsFusion
dc.keywordsMulticenter
dc.keywordsInstability
dc.keywordsSurgery
dc.keywordsNeutralization
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherHindawi Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofAdvances In Orthopedics
dc.subjectOrthopedics
dc.titlePosterior transpedicular dynamic stabilization versus total disc replacement in the treatment of lumbar painful degenerative disc disease: a comparison of clinical results
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorÖzer, Ali Fahir
local.publication.orgunit1SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
local.publication.orgunit2School of Medicine
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e

Files