Publication:
EPO or PlacEPO? Science versus Practical Experience: Panel discussion on efficacy of erythropoetin in improving performance

dc.contributor.coauthorHardeman, Max
dc.contributor.coauthorAlexy, Tamas
dc.contributor.coauthorBrouwer, Bram
dc.contributor.coauthorConnes, Philippe
dc.contributor.coauthorJung, Friedrich
dc.contributor.coauthorKuipers, Harm
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.facultymemberYes
dc.contributor.kuauthorBaşkurt, Oğuz Kerim
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSCHOOL OF MEDICINE
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T23:01:20Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.description.abstractRecombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) is an agent commonly used by athletes with the aim to improve performance in endurance sports. However, the scientific community continues to debate the risks, benefits and its mechanism of action when used as a doping agent. This paper provides a brief overview on the pros and cons of rHuEPO use, as discussed by a group of scientist with diverse background, at the 17th Conference of the European Society for Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation in Pecs, Hungary. Among multiple topics, panel members challenged the common belief that the increased circulating hemoglobin concentration is the simple key to the improved sporting performance. Rather, hemorheologists developed the concept of optimal hematocrit (Hct), a Hct value that represents the optimal balance between the oxygen transport capacity of blood and blood viscosity. While guideline-directed transfusion therapy is advantageous under pathological conditions, such as severe anemia related to chronic kidney disease, its beneficial effects on endurance in healthy athletes remains questionable. Further studies are warranted in the field evaluating the effects of rHuEPO that are independent of increasing hemoglobin concentration, such as peripheral vasodilation and tissue metabolic changes.
dc.description.fulltextNo
dc.description.harvestedfromManual
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.openaccessYES
dc.description.peerreviewstatusN/A
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.readpublishN/A
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.studentonlypublicationNo
dc.description.studentpublicationNo
dc.description.versionN/A
dc.identifier.WoSQuartileQ3
dc.identifier.doi10.3233/BIR-140655
dc.identifier.eissn1878-5034
dc.identifier.embargoN/A
dc.identifier.endpage90
dc.identifier.issn0006-355X
dc.identifier.issue2-3
dc.identifier.pubmed24819864
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84922634253
dc.identifier.startpage83
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3233/BIR-140655
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/8217
dc.identifier.volume51
dc.identifier.wos000339613200002
dc.keywordsErythropoetin
dc.keywordsBlood rheology
dc.keywordsExercise
dc.keywordsSports
dc.keywordsOptimal haematocrit
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherIOS Press
dc.relation.affiliationKoç University
dc.relation.collectionKoç University Institutional Repository
dc.relation.ispartofBiorheology
dc.relation.openaccessN/A
dc.rightsN/A
dc.subjectBiophysics
dc.subjectEngineering
dc.subjectHematology
dc.subjectBiomedical
dc.titleEPO or PlacEPO? Science versus Practical Experience: Panel discussion on efficacy of erythropoetin in improving performance
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorBaşkurt, Oğuz Kerim
relation.isGoalOfPublicationa9786601-9431-4553-9a46-013bb366fb87
relation.isGoalOfPublication.latestForDiscoverya9786601-9431-4553-9a46-013bb366fb87
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e

Files