Publication:
EPO or PlacEPO? Science versus practical experience

dc.contributor.coauthorHardeman, Max
dc.contributor.coauthorAlexy, Tamas
dc.contributor.coauthorBrouwer, Bram
dc.contributor.coauthorConnes, Philippe
dc.contributor.coauthorJung, Friedrich
dc.contributor.coauthorKuipers, Harm
dc.contributor.departmentN/A
dc.contributor.kuauthorBaşkurt, Oğuz Kerim
dc.contributor.kuprofileFaculty Member
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.yokidN/A
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T23:01:20Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.description.abstractRecombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) is an agent commonly used by athletes with the aim to improve performance in endurance sports. However, the scientific community continues to debate the risks, benefits and its mechanism of action when used as a doping agent. This paper provides a brief overview on the pros and cons of rHuEPO use, as discussed by a group of scientist with diverse background, at the 17th Conference of the European Society for Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation in Pecs, Hungary. Among multiple topics, panel members challenged the common belief that the increased circulating hemoglobin concentration is the simple key to the improved sporting performance. Rather, hemorheologists developed the concept of optimal hematocrit (Hct), a Hct value that represents the optimal balance between the oxygen transport capacity of blood and blood viscosity. While guideline-directed transfusion therapy is advantageous under pathological conditions, such as severe anemia related to chronic kidney disease, its beneficial effects on endurance in healthy athletes remains questionable. Further studies are warranted in the field evaluating the effects of rHuEPO that are independent of increasing hemoglobin concentration, such as peripheral vasodilation and tissue metabolic changes.
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.issue44987
dc.description.openaccessYES
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsorshipNSFC [3147 0070]
dc.description.sponsorshipOsaka University Scholarship for Short-term Overseas Research Activities
dc.description.sponsorshipCanada Research Chairs Programme
dc.description.sponsorshipShanxi Scholarship Council of China [2013-072]
dc.description.sponsorshipNatural Science Foundation of Shanxi [2014011030-4] We would like to thank the Forge Canada Consortium and Dr. Frank Rauch for allowing us to use their data. This work was supported by China NSFC grant 3147 0070 (JO) and by the Osaka University Scholarship for Short-term Overseas Research Activities 2013 (AI). Dr. Majewski is supported by the Canada Research Chairs Programme. This work was also supported by the Shanxi Scholarship Council of China 2013-072 (YL) and by the Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi 2014011030-4 (YL). The authors declare no conflict of interest. As mentioned in the original publications reporting on the patients, studies were approved by the Institutional Review Board of McGill University and informed consent was provided by study participants.
dc.description.volume51
dc.identifier.doi10.3233/BIR-140655
dc.identifier.eissn1878-5034
dc.identifier.issn0006-355X
dc.identifier.quartileQ4
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84922634253
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.3233/BIR-140655
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/8217
dc.identifier.wos339613200002
dc.keywordsErythropoetin
dc.keywordsBlood rheology
dc.keywordsExercise
dc.keywordsSports
dc.keywordsOptimal haematocrit
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherIOS Press
dc.sourceBiorheology
dc.subjectBiophysics
dc.subjectEngineering, biomedical
dc.subjectHematology
dc.titleEPO or PlacEPO? Science versus practical experience
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.authoridN/A
local.contributor.kuauthorBaşkurt, Oğuz Kerim

Files