Publication: Cancer-specific mortality differences in specimen-confined radical prostatectomy patients according to lymph node invasion
Program
KU-Authors
KU Authors
Co-Authors
Barletta, Francesco
Tappero, Stefano
Morra, Simone
Incesu, Reha-Baris
Cano Garcia, Cristina
Piccinelli, Mattia Luca
Scheipner, Lukas
Baudo, Andrea
Tian, Zhe
Gandaglia, Giorgio
Publication Date
Language
Type
Embargo Status
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Alternative Title
Abstract
Purpose: To test cancer-specific mortality (CSM) differences in specimen-confined (pT2) prostate cancer (PCa) at radical prostatectomy (RP) with lymph node dissection (LND) according to lymph node invasion (LNI). Methods: RP + LND pT2 PCa patients were identified (surveillance, epidemiology, and end results 2010-2015). CSM-FS rates were tested in Kaplan-Meier plots and multivariable Cox-regression (MCR) models. Sensitivity analyses respectively addressing patients with 6 or more lymph nodes analyzed and pT2 pN1 patients were performed. Results: Overall, 32,258 patients with pT2 PCa at RP + LND were identified. Of these, 448 (1.4%) patients harbored LNI. Five-year CSM-free estimates were 99.6% for pN0 vs. 96.4% for pN1 (P < .001). In MCR models, pN1 (HR: 3.4, P < .001) independently predicted higher CSM. In sensitivity analyses addressing patients with 6 or more lymph nodes analyzed (n = 15,437), 328 (2.1%) pN1 patients were identified. In this subgroup, 5-year CSM-free estimates were 99.6% for pN0 vs. 96.3% for pN1 (P < .001) and, in MCR models, pN1 independently predicted higher CSM (HR: 4.4, P < .001). In sensitivity analyses addressing pT2 pN1 patients, 5-year CSM-free estimates were 99.3, 100 and 84.8% for ISUP GG 1-3 vs. 4 vs. 5, respectively (P < .001). Conclusions: In patients with pT2 PCa a small proportion harbor LNI (1.4%-2.1%). In such patients, CSM rate is higher (HR 3.4-4.4, P < .001). This higher CSM risk seems to virtually exclusively apply to ISUP GG5 patients (84.8% 5-year CSM-free rate).
Source
Publisher
Elsevier Inc.
Subject
Oncology, Urology, Nephrology
Citation
Has Part
Source
Clinical Genitourinary Cancer
Book Series Title
Edition
DOI
10.1016/j.clgc.2023.05.010