Publication:
The role of hysteroscopy in fertility preservation in endometrial cancer and atypical endometrial hyperplasia: a semi-systematic literature review

dc.contributor.coauthorKahramanoğlu İ.
dc.contributor.kuauthorBilir, Esra
dc.contributor.kuprofileResearcher
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.yokidN/A
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T23:38:46Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Endometrial premalignancies are among the common reasons for outpatient gynecology visits among women in reproductive ages. Due to the continued increase in global obesity incidence among them, endometrial malignancies are expected to become even further prevalent. Hence, fertility-sparing interventions are essential and needed. In this semi-systematic literature review, we aimed to investigate the role of hysteroscopy in fertility preservation in endometrial cancer and atypical endometrial hyperplasia. Our secondary goal is to analyze the pregnancy outcomes following fertility preservation. Methods: We conducted a computed search in PubMed. We included original research articles including hysteroscopic interventions in pre-menopausal patients with endometrial malignancies and premalignancies who underwent fertility-preserving treatments. We collected data on medical treatment, response, pregnancy outcomes, and hysteroscopy. Results: Of the query results (n = 364), our final analysis included 24 studies. Overall, 1186 patients with endometrial premalignancies and endometrial cancer (EC) were included. More than half of the studies were retrospective design. They included almost ten different forms of progestins. Of the reported pregnancies (n = 392), the overall pregnancy rate was 33.1%. The majority of the studies used operative hysteroscopy (87.5%). Only three (12.5%) reported their hysteroscopy technique in detail. Although more than half of the studies did not provide any information on adverse effects due to hysteroscopy, there were no serious adverse effects among the reported ones. Conclusion: Hysteroscopic resection may increase the success rate of fertility-preserving treatment of EC and atypical endometrial hyperplasia. The clinical significance of the theoretical concern of the dissemination of cancer is not known. Standardization of the use of hysteroscopy in fertility-preserving treatment is needed. © 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.openaccessYES
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00404-023-06960-7
dc.identifier.issn0932-0067
dc.identifier.linkhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85148349523&doi=10.1007%2fs00404-023-06960-7&partnerID=40&md5=fa20a3effc27f63ce53b8886d4801d8a
dc.identifier.quartileQ3
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85148349523
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/12991
dc.keywordsAtypical endometrial hyperplasia
dc.keywordsEndometrial cancer
dc.keywordsFertility preservation
dc.keywordsHysteroscopy
dc.keywordsPregnancy
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
dc.sourceArchives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
dc.subjectEndometrial hyperplasia
dc.subjectFertility
dc.subjectLevonorgestrel
dc.titleThe role of hysteroscopy in fertility preservation in endometrial cancer and atypical endometrial hyperplasia: a semi-systematic literature review
dc.typeReview
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.authorid0000-0003-4499-6543
local.contributor.kuauthorBilir, Esra

Files