Publication:
Percutaneous access versus surgical cut down for TAVR: where do we go from here?

dc.contributor.coauthorAtes, Ismail
dc.contributor.departmentN/A
dc.contributor.kuauthorÇilingiroğlu, Mehmet
dc.contributor.kuprofileOther
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.yokidN/A
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T23:58:18Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractTranscatheter aortic valve replacement is now the standard of care for severe symptomatic aortic stenosis patients who are at high-surgical risk. Percutaneous approach without a surgical cut down has been increasingly adapted by some centers in USA. Percutaneous approach seems to be associated with shorter hospital stay, similar short and late vascular complications, less disabling stroke, similar mortality as well as significantly less hospital cost. However, this technique also requires operators to be able to manage any vascular complications using advanced endovascular interventions to achieve complete hemostasis.
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.issue7
dc.description.openaccessNO
dc.description.volume91
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ccd.27653
dc.identifier.eissn1522-726X
dc.identifier.issn1522-1946
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85048355146
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccd.27653
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/15447
dc.identifier.wos434955000039
dc.keywordsCardiac and cardiovascular systems
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherWiley
dc.sourceCatheterization And Cardiovascular Interventions
dc.subjectCardiac
dc.subjectCardiovascular systems
dc.titlePercutaneous access versus surgical cut down for TAVR: where do we go from here?
dc.typeOther
dc.type.otherEditorial material
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.authorid0000-0003-3795-8645
local.contributor.kuauthorÇilingiroğlu, Mehmet

Files