Publication:
Percutaneous access versus surgical cut down for TAVR: where do we go from here?

dc.contributor.coauthorAtes, Ismail
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.facultymemberNo
dc.contributor.kuauthorÇilingiroğlu, Mehmet
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSCHOOL OF MEDICINE
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T23:58:18Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractTranscatheter aortic valve replacement is now the standard of care for severe symptomatic aortic stenosis patients who are at high-surgical risk. Percutaneous approach without a surgical cut down has been increasingly adapted by some centers in USA. Percutaneous approach seems to be associated with shorter hospital stay, similar short and late vascular complications, less disabling stroke, similar mortality as well as significantly less hospital cost. However, this technique also requires operators to be able to manage any vascular complications using advanced endovascular interventions to achieve complete hemostasis.
dc.description.fulltextNo
dc.description.harvestedfromManual
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.openaccessNO
dc.description.peerreviewstatusN/A
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.readpublishN/A
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.versionN/A
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ccd.27653
dc.identifier.eissn1522-726X
dc.identifier.embargoN/A
dc.identifier.endpage1364
dc.identifier.issn1522-1946
dc.identifier.issue7
dc.identifier.pubmed29894594
dc.identifier.quartileQ2
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85048355146
dc.identifier.startpage1363
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.27653
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/15447
dc.identifier.volume91
dc.identifier.wos000434955000039
dc.keywordsTranscatheter aortic valve replacement
dc.keywordsPercutaneous access
dc.keywordsSurgical cut down
dc.keywordsTransfemoral approach
dc.keywordsVascular complications
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.affiliationKoç University
dc.relation.collectionKoç University Institutional Repository
dc.relation.ispartofCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
dc.relation.openaccessN/A
dc.rightsN/A
dc.subjectInterventional cardiology
dc.subjectStructural heart disease
dc.subjectVascular access
dc.titlePercutaneous access versus surgical cut down for TAVR: where do we go from here?
dc.typeOther
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorÇilingiroğlu, Mehmet
relation.isGoalOfPublicationa9786601-9431-4553-9a46-013bb366fb87
relation.isGoalOfPublication.latestForDiscoverya9786601-9431-4553-9a46-013bb366fb87
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e

Files