Publication:
Pathologic evaluation of large colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissections: an analysis of 279 cases with emphasis on the importance of multidisciplinary work and establishing examination protocols

Placeholder

Departments

School / College / Institute

Organizational Unit
Organizational Unit
SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
Upper Org Unit

Program

KU Authors

Co-Authors

Yılmaz, Serpil

Publication Date

Language

Embargo Status

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Alternative Title

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissections (ESDs) allow removal of large gastrointestinal tumors and help patients avoid major oncologic surgery. In this study, the challenges and development of approaches toward successfully handling ESDs were analyzed in 279 colorectal specimens (114 rectal, 47 left, 118 right colonic; 90% adenoma with/without carcinoma). Methods: Each specimen was processed according to an established protocol including gross photography, mapping, and total submission for histopathologic examination. Results: Mean lesion size was 4.2 cm (range: 0.5-22 cm; 28% >= 5 cm; 6% >= 10 cm). Invasive carcinoma was present in 38 cases (14%), which had a mean overall tumor size of 3.8 cm (range: 1.1-17.5 cm), and mean largest size of the invasive component was 0.93 cm (range: 0.04-3 cm). Fifteen cases were staged as pT1a (submucosal invasion of <1000 mu m) and 13 cases as pT1b (submucosal invasion of >= 1000 mu m). En-bloc and R0 resection rates were 99.3% and 90.6%, respectively. Conclusion: Various histopathologic challenges were encountered, which were carefully evaluated by dedicated pathologists with familiarity to the subtleties in handling and reporting these specimens. We recommend these specimens to be prepared in the endoscopy suite, submitted to the Pathology Department oriented, pinned, and placed into copious amount of fixative. Total sampling, gross photography, mapping, and proper fixation are crucial components in the histopathologic evaluation. Micromeasurement of invasion depth and substaging per European/Japanese guidelines as well as accurate measurement of the distance from the resection margins are highly recommended. In conclusion, ESD is an adequate method that can be successfully implemented in a tertiary care center to perform en-bloc and margin-free resections of clinically selected large colorectal superficial lesions.

Source

Publisher

Sage Publications Inc

Subject

Pathology, Surgery

Citation

Has Part

Source

International Journal of Surgical Pathology

Book Series Title

Edition

DOI

10.1177/1066896920918309

item.page.datauri

Link

Rights

Copyrights Note

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

0

Views

0

Downloads

View PlumX Details