Publication: Whose innovation performance benefits more from external networks: Entrepreneurial or conservative firms?
dc.contributor.coauthor | Baker, William E. | |
dc.contributor.coauthor | Grinstein, Amir | |
dc.contributor.department | Department of Business Administration | |
dc.contributor.kuauthor | Harmancıoğlu, Nükhet | |
dc.contributor.kuprofile | Faculty Member | |
dc.contributor.other | Department of Business Administration | |
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstitute | College of Administrative Sciences and Economics | |
dc.contributor.yokid | 123423 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-11-10T00:00:44Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.description.abstract | The primary contribution of this research is positing and empirically supporting the proposition that learning through external networks disproportionately benefits conservative, risk-averse firms. The construct, entrepreneurial orientation (EO), is used to discriminate conservative, risk-averse firms from proactive, risk-seeking firms. Organizational learning theory and social capital theory are employed to support our hypotheses. Based on a study of 1978 U.S. firms, the paper suggests that the utilization of external networks (i.e., the process of learning from information, perspectives, and insights embedded in external networks) may act as a primary driver for innovation for those firms that are either not inclined and/or do not have the capabilities to adopt entrepreneurial culture. Specifically, weak EO firms' innovation performance benefits from utilizing external networks more than strong EO firms'. This research also tests for the moderating role of firm size and finds that the negative moderating effect of EO on the external network utilization–innovation performance relationship is more pronounced in small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) than large firms. | |
dc.description.indexedby | WoS | |
dc.description.indexedby | Scopus | |
dc.description.issue | 1 | |
dc.description.openaccess | NO | |
dc.description.publisherscope | International | |
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEu | N/A | |
dc.description.volume | 33 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/jpim.12263 | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1540-5885 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0737-6782 | |
dc.identifier.quartile | Q1 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12263 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/15856 | |
dc.identifier.wos | 368589800008 | |
dc.keywords | Market orientation | |
dc.keywords | Overlooked role | |
dc.keywords | Knowledge | |
dc.keywords | Antecedents | |
dc.keywords | Information | |
dc.keywords | Strategy | |
dc.keywords | Ties | |
dc.keywords | Exploitation | |
dc.keywords | Construct | |
dc.keywords | Paradox | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.publisher | WILEY | |
dc.relation.grantno | Entrepreneurial Management Center at San Diego State University | |
dc.relation.grantno | Faculty Development Grant Program at San Diego State University The authors would like to thank the Entrepreneurial Management Center and the Faculty Development Grant Program, both at San Diego State University, for the generous support of this research. They are also thankful for the comments made by James M. Sinkula and Mark Youndt. | |
dc.source | Journal of Product Innovation Management | |
dc.subject | Business | |
dc.subject | Engineering | |
dc.subject | Industrial engineering | |
dc.subject | Management | |
dc.title | Whose innovation performance benefits more from external networks: Entrepreneurial or conservative firms? | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
local.contributor.authorid | 0000-0002-2538-3189 | |
local.contributor.kuauthor | Harmancıoğlu, Nükhet | |
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | ca286af4-45fd-463c-a264-5b47d5caf520 | |
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | ca286af4-45fd-463c-a264-5b47d5caf520 |