Publication:
Growth of non-English-language literature on biodiversity conservation

dc.contributor.coauthorChowdhury, S.
dc.contributor.coauthorGonzalez, K.
dc.contributor.coauthorBaek, S.Y.
dc.contributor.coauthorBe?cik, M.
dc.contributor.coauthorBertolino, S.
dc.contributor.coauthorDuijns S.
dc.contributor.coauthorHan Y.
dc.contributor.coauthorJantke, K. Katayose, R.
dc.contributor.coauthorLin, M.M.
dc.contributor.coauthorNourani, E.
dc.contributor.coauthorRamos, D.L.
dc.contributor.coauthorRouyer, M.O.
dc.contributor.coauthorSidemo Holm, W.
dc.contributor.coauthorVozykova, S. Zamora-Gutierrez, V.
dc.contributor.coauthorAmano T.
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics
dc.contributor.kuauthorAytekin, M. Çisel Kemahlı
dc.contributor.kuprofileUndergraduate Student
dc.contributor.kuprofileFaculty Member
dc.contributor.otherDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteCollege of Sciences
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T13:47:02Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractEnglish is widely recognized as the language of science, and English-language publications (ELPs) are rapidly increasing. It is often assumed that the number of non-ELPs is decreasing. This assumption contributes to the underuse of non-ELPs in conservation science, practice, and policy, especially at the international level. However, the number of conservation articles published in different languages is poorly documented. Using local and international search systems, we searched for scientific articles on biodiversity conservation published from 1980 to 2018 in English and 15 non-English languages. We compared the growth rate in publications across languages. In 12 of the 15 non-English languages, published conservation articles significantly increased every year over the past 39 years, at a rate similar to English-language articles. The other three languages showed contrasting results, depending on the search system. Since the 1990s, conservation science articles in most languages increased exponentially. The variation in the number of non-English-language articles identified among the search systems differed markedly (e.g., for simplified Chinese, 11,148 articles returned with local search system and 803 with Scopus). Google Scholar and local literature search systems returned the most articles for 11 and 4 non-English languages, respectively. However, the proportion of peer-reviewed conservation articles published in non-English languages was highest in Scopus, followed by Web of Science and local search systems, and lowest in Google Scholar. About 20% of the sampled non-English-language articles provided no title or abstract in English; thus, in theory, they were undiscoverable with English keywords. Possible reasons for this include language barriers and the need to disseminate research in countries where English is not widely spoken. Given the known biases in statistical methods and study characteristics between English- and non-English-language studies, non-English-language articles will continue to play an important role in improving the understanding of biodiversity and its conservation.
dc.description.fulltextYES
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.issue4
dc.description.openaccessYES
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuEU
dc.description.sponsorshipAustralian Government
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of Queensland
dc.description.sponsorshipCentre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science
dc.description.sponsorshipGerman Research Foundation (DFG)
dc.description.sponsorshipGermany’s Excellence Strategy
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversitat Hamburg Center for Earth System Research and Sustainability (CEN)
dc.description.sponsorshipClimate,Climatic Change, and Society (CLICCS)
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Union (EU)
dc.description.sponsorshipHorizon 2020
dc.description.sponsorshipMarie Sklodowska-Curie
dc.description.sponsorshipAustralian Research Council Future Fellowship
dc.description.versionPublisher version
dc.description.volume36
dc.formatpdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/cobi.13883
dc.identifier.eissn1523-1739
dc.identifier.embargoNO
dc.identifier.filenameinventorynoIR03449
dc.identifier.issn0888-8892
dc.identifier.linkhttps://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13883
dc.identifier.quartileQ1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85127355937
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/3743
dc.identifier.wos772278600001
dc.keywordsBarrera del lenguaje
dc.keywordsBases de datos de la biodiversidad mundial
dc.keywordsBiodiversity information
dc.keywordsEvidence synthesis
dc.keywordsGlobal biodiversity databases
dc.keywordsIdiomas
dc.keywordsInformacion sobre la biodiversidad
dc.keywordsLanguage barrier
dc.keywordsLanguages
dc.keywordsPublication bias
dc.keywordsSesgo de publicacion
dc.keywordsSintesis de evidencias
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.grantno390683824
dc.relation.grantnoFT180100354
dc.relation.grantno766417
dc.relation.urihttp://cdm21054.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/IR/id/10243
dc.sourceConservation Biology
dc.subjectBiodiversity and conservation
dc.subjectEnvironmental sciences and ecology
dc.titleGrowth of non-English-language literature on biodiversity conservation
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorAytekin, M. Çisel Kemahlı
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationaee2d329-aabe-4b58-ba67-09dbf8575547
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryaee2d329-aabe-4b58-ba67-09dbf8575547

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
10243.pdf
Size:
1.38 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format