Publication:
Terminal flourishes but not trills differ between urban and rural Chaffinch song

dc.contributor.coauthorAtalas, Berkay
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Media and Visual Arts
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Psychology
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Psychology
dc.contributor.kuauthorYelimlieş, Alper
dc.contributor.kuauthorÖnsal, Çağla
dc.contributor.kuauthorAkçay, Çağlar
dc.contributor.kuprofileUndergraduate Student
dc.contributor.kuprofileMaster Student
dc.contributor.kuprofileFaculty Member
dc.contributor.otherDepartment of Media and Visual Arts
dc.contributor.otherDepartment of Psychology
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteCollege of Social Sciences and Humanities
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteGraduate School of Social Sciences and Humanities
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteCollege of Social Sciences and Humanities
dc.contributor.yokidN/A
dc.contributor.yokidN/A
dc.contributor.yokid272053
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-10T00:08:18Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractAnimals can evade interference from anthropogenic noise using strategies such as shifting frequencies upwards or increasing the duration of their signals. In this study, we compared the time and frequency-related characteristics of songs and rain calls of Common Chaffinches Fringilla coelebs inhabiting rural forests and an urban park in Turkey. Most of the song phrases and rain calls did not differ in any of the characteristics measured between urban and rural Chaffinches but, contrary to our predictions, terminal flourish phrases of the songs had lower minimum frequencies and broader bandwidth in urban territories. These results suggest either that noise has limited effect on the Chaffinch vocalizations or that Chaffinch vocalizations in urban habitats are less well adapted for efficient transmission. © 2023 British Ornithologists' Union.
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.openaccessYES
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ibi.13186
dc.identifier.issn0019-1019
dc.identifier.linkhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85148509979&doi=10.1111%2fibi.13186&partnerID=40&md5=a0800b4ceaf1ead8cf477df3881e86df
dc.identifier.quartileQ1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85148509979
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ibi.13186
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/16935
dc.identifier.wos937743100001
dc.keywordsAnthropogenic noise
dc.keywordsBird song
dc.keywordsCommunication
dc.keywordsRain call
dc.keywordsUrbanization
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherJohn Wiley and Sons Inc
dc.sourceIBIS
dc.subjectZoology
dc.subjectOrnithology
dc.titleTerminal flourishes but not trills differ between urban and rural Chaffinch song
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.authoridN/A
local.contributor.authoridN/A
local.contributor.authorid0000-0003-0635-9586
local.contributor.kuauthorYelimlieş, Alper
local.contributor.kuauthorÖnsal, Çağla
local.contributor.kuauthorAkçay, Çağlar
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication483fa792-2b89-4020-9073-eb4f497ee3fd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd5fc0361-3a0a-4b96-bf2e-5cd6b2b0b08c
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery483fa792-2b89-4020-9073-eb4f497ee3fd

Files