Publication:
The role of the size and number of index lesion in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with PI-RADS 4 lesions who underwent in-bore MRI-guided prostate biopsy

dc.contributor.coauthorKilic, Mert
dc.contributor.coauthorMadendere, Serdar
dc.contributor.coauthorVural, Metin
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.facultymemberYes
dc.contributor.kuauthorBalbay, Mevlana Derya
dc.contributor.kuauthorEsen, Tarık
dc.contributor.kuauthorKöseoğlu, Ersin
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSCHOOL OF MEDICINE
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-10T00:00:38Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractPurpose To evaluate the contribution of the size and number of the sampled lesions to the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPC) in patients who had PI-RADS 4 lesions. Methods In this retrospective study, a total of 159 patients who had PI-RADS 4 lesions and underwent In-bore MRI-Guided prostate biopsy were included. Patients with a lesion classified as Grade Group 2 and above were considered to have CSPC. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to evaluate the factors affecting the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) and CSPC. Results A great majority (86.8%) of the patients were biopsy-naive. About three-fourths (71.7%) had PCa, and half (54.1%) had CSPC. When the patients were divided into three groups according to the index lesion size (< 5 mm, 5-10 mm, and > 10 mm), the prevalence of PCa was 64.3, 67.5, and 82.4% and the prevalence of CSPC was 42.9, 51.2, and 64.7%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, age, index lesion size, prostate volume (< 50 ml) and being biopsy-naive were found significant for PCa, while age and prostate volume (< 50 ml) were significant for CSPC. Conclusion The number of lesions was found to be insignificant in predicting PCa and CSPC. While the size of PI-RADS 4 lesions was significant in predicting PCa, it had no significance in detecting CSPC.
dc.description.fulltextNo
dc.description.harvestedfromManual
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.openaccessNO
dc.description.peerreviewstatusN/A
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.readpublishN/A
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.versionN/A
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00345-022-04274-y
dc.identifier.eissn1433-8726
dc.identifier.embargoN/A
dc.identifier.issn0724-4983
dc.identifier.quartileQ2
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85145500873
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04274-y
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/15840
dc.identifier.wos907097900002
dc.keywordsBiopsy
dc.keywordsMagnetic resonance imaging
dc.keywordsProstate cancer
dc.keywordsProstate imaging reporting and data system
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.affiliationKoç University
dc.relation.collectionKoç University Institutional Repository
dc.relation.ispartofWorld Journal of Urology
dc.relation.openaccessN/A
dc.rightsN/A
dc.subjectUrology
dc.subjectNephrology
dc.titleThe role of the size and number of index lesion in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with PI-RADS 4 lesions who underwent in-bore MRI-guided prostate biopsy
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorKöseoğlu, Ersin
local.contributor.kuauthorEsen, Tarık
local.contributor.kuauthorBalbay, Mevlana Derya
relation.isGoalOfPublicationa9786601-9431-4553-9a46-013bb366fb87
relation.isGoalOfPublication.latestForDiscoverya9786601-9431-4553-9a46-013bb366fb87
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e

Files