Publication:
Antegrade stent placement in laparoscopic upper urinary tract surgery. Is there an easy way?

dc.contributor.coauthorGökçen, Kaan
dc.contributor.coauthorGökçe, Gökhan
dc.contributor.coauthorKıraç, Emre
dc.contributor.coauthorDündar, Gökçe
dc.contributor.coauthorGültekin, Emin Yener
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.kuauthorKordan, Yakup
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSCHOOL OF MEDICINE
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T11:51:46Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Antegrade placement of double J stents in laparoscopy is considered a challenging and time-consuming process due to limitations regarding stent flexibility. Aim: to describe the method we used to facilitate the antegrade placement of intracorporeal stents in laparoscopic upper urinary tract (LUUT) surgery and report its results. Material and methods: data obtained from 42 consecutive patients who had stents placed antegradely in laparoscopic pyeloplasty or in laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for middle-upper ureteral stones were retrospectively evaluated. The mean age of the patients was 30.1 +/- 18.6 (10 months-68 years) and 13 patients were in the paediatric age group. All patients in the paediatric age group underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Results: The mean operative time for the 42 total cases, of which 32 underwent laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty and 10 laparoscopic ureterolithotomy, was 126.9 +/- 33.5 (70-200) min and the intraoperative stent placement time was calculated as 2.61 +/- 0.8 (1.5-5) min. The patients, who had a mean hospitalization time of 2.8 +/- 0.9 (2-5) months, required no additional interventions and no complications were encountered intraoperatively. In the patient series that had a mean follow-up time of 17.4 +/- 11.3 (1-35), it was determined only in 1 patient that the distal tip of the stent had not been in the bladder. Conclusions: The described modified antegrade stent placement technique is a practical method that is safe for all LUUT cases in both paediatric and adult age groups and it has been shown to produce successful outcomes and to be time-saving.
dc.description.fulltextYES
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.openaccessYES
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.sponsorshipN/A
dc.description.versionPublisher version
dc.description.volume14
dc.identifier.doi10.5114/wiitm.2018.77260
dc.identifier.embargoNO
dc.identifier.filenameinventorynoIR01697
dc.identifier.issn1895-4588
dc.identifier.quartileN/A
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85061113200
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2018.77260
dc.identifier.wos457117600015
dc.keywordsLaparoscopy
dc.keywordsStenting
dc.keywordsPyeloplasty
dc.keywordsPelviureteral anastomoses
dc.keywordsUpper ureteral stones
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherTermedia Publishing
dc.relation.grantnoNA
dc.relation.ispartofVideosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques
dc.relation.urihttp://cdm21054.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/IR/id/8340
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.subjectUrology and nephrology
dc.titleAntegrade stent placement in laparoscopic upper urinary tract surgery. Is there an easy way?
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorKordan, Yakup
local.publication.orgunit1SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
local.publication.orgunit2School of Medicine
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
8340.pdf
Size:
159.28 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format