Publication: The effect of treatment intensification on other-cause mortality in clear-cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients
Program
KU-Authors
KU Authors
Co-Authors
Incesu, Reha-Baris
Barletta, Francesco
Garcia, Cristina Cano
Scheipner, Lukas
Morra, Simone
Baudo, Andrea
Assad, Anis
Tian, Zhe
Saad, Fred
Shariat, Shahrokh F.
Editor & Affiliation
Compiler & Affiliation
Translator
Other Contributor
Date
Language
Type
Embargo Status
N/A
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Alternative Title
Abstract
Background: The effect of treatment intensification (systemic therapy [ST] + cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) vs. ST alone) is unknown regarding rates of other-cause mortality (OCM) in clear-cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma (ccmRCC). We hypothesized that intensified treatment (ST + CN) may result in higher OCM, than when ST is used alone. Methods: Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, all ccmRCC patients treated 2010-2018 either with ST + CN or ST alone were identified. Propensity score matching (PSM), cumulative incidence plots, multivariable competing risks regression analyses and 6 months' landmark analyses addressed OCM and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) according to treatment status. Results: Of 2271 ccmRCC patients, 1233 (54%) were treated with ST + CN vs 1038 (46%) with ST alone. After 1:1 PSM, OCM was 5.3 vs. 4.6 % (P = .5) and CSM was 73.4 vs. 88.4% (P < .001) in ST + CN vs. ST alone patients. In multivariable competing risks regression, the combination of ST and CN was not associated with higher OCM (HR 1.3;95% CI 0.8-2.1;P = .4), vs. ST alone. However, the combination of ST and CN was independently associated with lower CSM (HR 0.5;95% CI 0.5-0.6;P < .001), vs. ST alone. After 6 months' landmark analyses, these multivariable associations remained unchanged. Conclusions: The current study indicates no OCM-disadvantage in ST + CN ccmRCC patients, relative to their ST alone counterparts. Conversely, a strong association with lower CSM was recorded in ST + CN patients, relative to their ST alone counterparts. These associations are robust and remained unchanged after strictest statistical adjustment including control for immortal time bias.
Source
Publisher
Elsevier
Subject
Oncology, Urology , Nephrology
Citation
Has Part
Source
Clinical Genitourinary Cancer
Book Series Title
Edition
DOI
10.1016/j.clgc.2023.12.013
item.page.datauri
Link
Rights
N/A
