Publication:
Gender differences in attitudes towards abortion: a cross-sectional study from Türkiye

Placeholder

Departments

Organizational Unit

School / College / Institute

Organizational Unit
SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
Upper Org Unit

Program

KU Authors

Co-Authors

Editor & Affiliation

Compiler & Affiliation

Translator

Other Contributor

Date

Language

eng

Embargo Status

No

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Alternative Title

Abstract

Attitudes toward induced abortion are shaped by sociocultural and religious factors, gender-related constructs, and prevailing health policies.This study aims to explore gender-based differences in attitudes toward abortion among Turkish college students and to examine associated factors, including religiosity, regional background, academic field, and health literacy. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted in May 2022 using an online, anonymous questionnaire completed by 326 university students across seven geographic regions of T & uuml;rkiye. Participants completed the Turkish versions of the Abortion Attitude Scale (AAS) and the Health Literacy Scale for Young Adults (HLS). Statistical analysis was conducted using non-parametric tests due to non-normal data distribution. Results Approximately 76% of participants expressed either moderate or strong pro-abortion attitudes. Female students (81%) and non-binary students (100%) were significantly more likely than male students (67.2%) to support abortion (p < 0.05). While no significant association was found between abortion attitudes and health literacy, notable associations emerged with religiosity (p < 0.001) and longest-lived region (p = 0.014). Support for abortion was higher among female than male students across all scenarios, including public insurance coverage, and varied by academic discipline, with the strongest support among law and arts students. Conclusions Abortion attitudes among Turkish university students varied by gender and sociocultural factors, highlighting ethical tensions related to reproductive autonomy and the need for education and justice-oriented policy reforms.

Source

Publisher

BioMed Central

Subject

Ethics, Medical ethics, Biomedical, Social sciences

Citation

Has Part

Source

BMC Medical Ethics

Book Series Title

Edition

DOI

10.1186/s12910-026-01433-3

item.page.datauri

Link

Rights

N/A

Copyrights Note

Creative Commons license

Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as N/A

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Goal

0

Views

0

Downloads

View PlumX Details