Publication:
Gender differences in attitudes towards abortion: a cross-sectional study from Türkiye

dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.kuauthorÇakar, Aysu
dc.contributor.kuauthorŞenköylü, Karya
dc.contributor.kuauthorErenler, Ece
dc.contributor.kuauthorÖzer, Selin
dc.contributor.kuauthorKocu, Cennet
dc.contributor.kuauthorSakarya, Sibel
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSCHOOL OF MEDICINE
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-02T07:30:11Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractAttitudes toward induced abortion are shaped by sociocultural and religious factors, gender-related constructs, and prevailing health policies.This study aims to explore gender-based differences in attitudes toward abortion among Turkish college students and to examine associated factors, including religiosity, regional background, academic field, and health literacy. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted in May 2022 using an online, anonymous questionnaire completed by 326 university students across seven geographic regions of T & uuml;rkiye. Participants completed the Turkish versions of the Abortion Attitude Scale (AAS) and the Health Literacy Scale for Young Adults (HLS). Statistical analysis was conducted using non-parametric tests due to non-normal data distribution. Results Approximately 76% of participants expressed either moderate or strong pro-abortion attitudes. Female students (81%) and non-binary students (100%) were significantly more likely than male students (67.2%) to support abortion (p < 0.05). While no significant association was found between abortion attitudes and health literacy, notable associations emerged with religiosity (p < 0.001) and longest-lived region (p = 0.014). Support for abortion was higher among female than male students across all scenarios, including public insurance coverage, and varied by academic discipline, with the strongest support among law and arts students. Conclusions Abortion attitudes among Turkish university students varied by gender and sociocultural factors, highlighting ethical tensions related to reproductive autonomy and the need for education and justice-oriented policy reforms.
dc.description.fulltextNo
dc.description.harvestedfromManual
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.readpublishN/A
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.versionPublished Version
dc.identifier.WoSQuartileQ1
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12910-026-01433-3
dc.identifier.embargoNo
dc.identifier.issn1472-6939
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.pubmed41845351
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105036900237
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-026-01433-3
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/33028
dc.identifier.volume27
dc.identifier.wos001747463600003
dc.keywordsAutonomy
dc.keywordsGender
dc.keywordsReproductive ethics
dc.keywordsReproductive justice
dc.keywordsReproductive rights
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherBioMed Central
dc.relation.affiliationKoç University
dc.relation.collectionKoç University Institutional Repository
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Medical Ethics
dc.relation.openaccessN/A
dc.rightsN/A
dc.rights.uriN/A
dc.subjectEthics
dc.subjectMedical ethics
dc.subjectBiomedical
dc.subjectSocial sciences
dc.titleGender differences in attitudes towards abortion: a cross-sectional study from Türkiye
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e

Files