Publication:
Water jet guided laser vs. conventional laser: experimental comparison of surface integrity for different aerospace alloys

dc.contributor.coauthorSubaşı, L.
dc.contributor.coauthorGünaydin, A.
dc.contributor.coauthorDiboine, J.
dc.contributor.coauthorOzaner, O. C.
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Mechanical Engineering
dc.contributor.departmentGraduate School of Sciences and Engineering
dc.contributor.kuauthorBektaş, Erdem
dc.contributor.kuauthorCanadinç, Demircan
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteCollege of Engineering
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteGRADUATE SCHOOL OF SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T12:14:34Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractLaser cutting is a widely used manufacturing technology in aerospace industry. However, although considered a fast process, lasers have some quality issues associated with high heat input to the ma-terials. Water jet guided laser is a technology that overcomes most of these issues, where pressurized water in the process provides focusing, cooling and cleaning on the cut region, eliminating undesired side effects of the laser. In this study, cutting performances of a water jet guided laser system and a conventional laser system were compared. For this purpose, well-known quality problems of laser cutting were considered, namely dross/burr formation, surface quality, taper and recast layer. The samples were chosen among commonly used aerospace alloys: Haynes 188, Inconel 718, Inconel 625, Rene 41 and Ti-6Al-4V. Visual checks and measurements of surface roughness, taper and recast layer were conducted on the samples. The results show that cutting with a water jet guided laser system overall provides better surface integrity when compared to a conventional laser system.
dc.description.fulltextYES
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.openaccessYES
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.sponsorshipN/A
dc.description.versionPublisher version
dc.description.volume16
dc.identifier.doi10.2961/jlmn.2021.01.2001
dc.identifier.embargoNO
dc.identifier.filenameinventorynoIR02844
dc.identifier.issn1880-0688
dc.identifier.quartileN/A
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85103321288
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/1298
dc.identifier.wos639335200001
dc.keywordsAerospace materials
dc.keywordsLaser cutting
dc.keywordsSurface integrity
dc.keywordsSurface quality
dc.keywordsWater jet
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherJapan Laser Processing Society (JLPS)
dc.relation.grantnoNA
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Laser Micro/Nanoengineering
dc.relation.urihttp://cdm21054.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/IR/id/9495
dc.subjectScience and technology
dc.subjectMaterials science
dc.subjectOptics
dc.subjectPhysics
dc.titleWater jet guided laser vs. conventional laser: experimental comparison of surface integrity for different aerospace alloys
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorCanadinç, Demircan
local.contributor.kuauthorBektaş, Erdem
local.publication.orgunit1College of Engineering
local.publication.orgunit1GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING
local.publication.orgunit2Department of Mechanical Engineering
local.publication.orgunit2Graduate School of Sciences and Engineering
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationba2836f3-206d-4724-918c-f598f0086a36
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication3fc31c89-e803-4eb1-af6b-6258bc42c3d8
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryba2836f3-206d-4724-918c-f598f0086a36
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication8e756b23-2d4a-4ce8-b1b3-62c794a8c164
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication434c9663-2b11-4e66-9399-c863e2ebae43
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery8e756b23-2d4a-4ce8-b1b3-62c794a8c164

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
9495.pdf
Size:
1.98 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format